As per usual i think it depends on the area and enviroment.
I know if i was seen in some areas of both the UK and Greece in DPM then it would attract a lot of suspicion.
Other areas not many would blink an eye.
Can't honestly say as it bothers me what people wear.
What gets me though is people harping on about how great ex-MOD stuff is, there are a few bits that are ok but in my experience 99% is crap.
It's cheap crap that's made to a strict price control that needs to last a certain length of time in certain environments.
The NI rucksack is a prime example, i'd sooner sling a Tesco's bag on my back than do a 10 mile hike with one.
Sure they're cheap, but then if your off work for 2 days after every hike with a bad back it's a false philosophy, plus your often buying used so it's no good comparing a used MOD prices with new Civvy prices.
I do understand that for some folks the ex-MOD kit is "good enough" for their needs, "good enough" some how turns into some evangelical preaching about how it's the best stuff since sliced bread.
If someone lugs 10kg of kit 2 miles from the car and back, they can't in good conscience "recommend" the same rucksack for someone that's taking off on a 3 day trek with 20kg of kit covering 10 miles a day, can they.
Yet i see this on a regular basis.
What makes it worse is peoples intentions are good, they're really trying to help and advise people.
But with a hobby as diverse as ours here we really to need to take care what we are "advising", we should also be clear and concise as to the other options we've tried similar.
As an example it's no good saying "the NI pack is the best pack i've ever used" if it's the only one you've used.
So i have no problem with DPM stuff but i have seen a fair bot of this evangelical ex-MOD singing which i personally believe needs to be put into a context.
Cheers
Mark