How to encourage diversity in bushcraft

  • Hey Guest, For sale we have Hultafors Outdoor Knives with Firesteel PLEASE LOOK HERE for more information or use the Pay Now button in the sidebar

C_Claycomb

Mod
Mod
Oct 6, 2003
6,438
1,397
Bedfordshire
....
Only the other day a neighbour shouted.. there goes Bear(Grylls)off to kill a squirrel!
Is this how we are portrayed as Bushcrafters?
I hope not & now I have the embarrassing task of putting him right.
When you hunt for food, do you hunt squirrels?
I had that sort of remark from work colleagues more times than I could count after they found that I was interested in bushcraft, and had admitted to eating squirrel. So, yes, that is one way that bushcraft is seen. Perhaps that is part of why we don't get much interest from certain quarters?

I wish you luck "putting him right". My colleagues would bring stuff like that up every once in a while even after I had explained how I viewed Mr Grylls and how squirrel was tasty.
 

Wander

Settler
Jan 6, 2017
637
763
Here There & Everywhere
This all brings to mind Karl Popper's paradox of tolerance - to be a tolerant society we have to be intolerant of intolerance.
Seems to me that both sides in that video were displaying intolerance.
Popper suggested that if we are open-endedly tolerant then society will be controlled by the intolerant. So opposing (that is, intolerating) intolerance is the wise action of a tolerant society.
Out of deference to the forum's rules I am going to avoid an obviously political analogy. So to try and keep things on track, what this would mean is that allowing Group A to say that Group X has no place in the countryside may seem tolerant by allowing free speech. But by allowing their intolerance to say what they want we allow and legitimise them to ban Group X from the countryside. All to the detriment of Group X. When we tell Group A to shut up because it's unfair to Group X then Group A might get all up in arms claiming they are being silenced and de-platformed - that it's their right to free speech. Group A are then allowed to carry on their intolerance - they decide that Group Y are no longer allowed in the countryside. And Group Z are banned as well. Our tolerance of Group A has allowed them to take over and led to an intolerant society.
So, no.
Intolerating intolerance is the only, paradoxical, action a tolerant society can take.

I hope that's made sense (seems clear in my mind. And Karl Poppers)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Davey569

C_Claycomb

Mod
Mod
Oct 6, 2003
6,438
1,397
Bedfordshire
The problem today seems to be identifying who is the intolerant group we should not tolerate! :lmao:
What we have seen recently is more like Group A says something critical of Group X, then Group W siding with Group X gets Group A de-platformed. Having succeeded in vanquishing the "intolerant" Group A, the Group W who is tolerant of X but not of A moves on to campaigning to vanquish the next "intolerant" group in line, who no one really paid any attention to before. At some point Group W morphs into Group T, which latches on to something that Group X said that was critical of Group Y, and so it goes on.

:banghead2: .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Winnet

TeeDee

Full Member
Nov 6, 2008
7,022
1,232
47
Exeter
The problem today seems to be identifying who is the intolerant group we should not tolerate! :lmao:
What we have seen recently is more like Group A says something critical of Group X, then Group W siding with Group X gets Group A de-platformed. Having succeeded in vanquishing the "intolerant" Group A, the Group W who is tolerant of X but not of A moves on to campaigning to vanquish the next "intolerant" group in line, who no one really paid any attention to before. At some point Group W morphs into Group T, which latches on to something that Group X said that was critical of Group Y, and so it goes on.

:banghead2: .

And this is the inherent problem of looking at people as Groups and not as individuals.
 

henchy3rd

Full Member
Apr 16, 2012
390
250
Derby
The problem today seems to be identifying who is the intolerant group we should not tolerate! :lmao:
What we have seen recently is more like Group A says something critical of Group X, then Group W siding with Group X gets Group A de-platformed. Having succeeded in vanquishing the "intolerant" Group A, the Group W who is tolerant of X but not of A moves on to campaigning to vanquish the next "intolerant" group in line, who no one really paid any attention to before. At some point Group W morphs into Group T, which latches on to something that Group X said that was critical of Group Y, and so it goes on.

:banghead2: .
I think you summed up today’s society pretty well there..why didn’t you day that in the first place!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Winnet

TLM

Native
Nov 16, 2019
1,659
742
Vantaa, Finland
The problem today seems to be identifying who is the intolerant group we should not tolerate! :lmao:
What we have seen recently is more like Group A says something critical of Group X, then Group W siding with Group X gets Group A de-platformed. Having succeeded in vanquishing the "intolerant" Group A, the Group W who is tolerant of X but not of A moves on to campaigning to vanquish the next "intolerant" group in line, who no one really paid any attention to before. At some point Group W morphs into Group T, which latches on to something that Group X said that was critical of Group Y, and so it goes on.
That is just what is needed, a recipe for cancelling everybody ... :wacky:
 

CLEM

Full Member
Jul 10, 2004
2,101
180
Stourbridge
I find this discussion utterly baffling, I really do. But then I have to remind myself to remember that “ it’s our greatest strength. lol
 

Minotaur

Native
Apr 27, 2005
1,222
69
Birmingham
I sort of think this is what is wrong with the world.
Lets take why are Women paid less than men and mainstream media says it is all mens fault. Jordan Petterson on the other hand points out that there are 32 reasons why, for example men choose jobs that pay more because they are more dangerous.
Take Stem we are told we need more women in these fields however men are interested in things and women are interested in people which means that all of the math skilled women become doctors etc. I do not see anyone trying to get more men to be nurses and doctors. In fact they have made it harder for men to become nurses because most of the male nurses I know made the decision later in life.
I am sorry Woody Girl is gone because I was going to point out that my Niece who earns more than her two older sisters, got a lot of her college stuff paid for and is getting her degree paid for as well. Why you may ask because she went into software development which she is excelling at, has been promoted twice and has been the only woman a lot.
There is a really interesting thing about how to solve these big problems. To give an example there is an example of trying to get more kids in school in Africa were they where buying books etc and nothing was improving so in the end they got someone to look at it. The result was to give the kids worm medicine which meant they stopped being ill so turned up to school.
The bias thing is really interesting when you look at it because they now make orchestra musicians audition behind screens because for some bizarre reason the people doing the auditions think men sound better than women. These are woke artistic types who cannot work out why this is however it a provable fact.
Also several wrong things have been said about the Scouts. Scouts was started by kids who read Scouting for boys and formed their own patrols. BP never intended to start the Scout association. The reason girls are not in the scouts is sexism from a woman because there was a girls patrol at the first jamboree and it was seen by Mrs BP as a bad thing and so she formed the Girl Guides. Finally scouts was never intended to be a Bushcraft organisation, the point was to create good thinking citizens. A scout is a person who leads and relies on themselves to move through the world. BP despite being part of some big organisations was a massive individualist. The scout association has changed what was supposed to be a way to create leaders into a babysitting service.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Davey569 and CLEM

Hultafors Outdoor knife for Sale

We have a a number of Hultafors Outdoor Knives with Firesteels for sale.

You can see more details here in this thread OUTDOOR KNIVES The price is £27 posted to the UK. Pay via the paypal button below.