and farmers don't need science to tell them that badgers carry TB. Luckily the country isn't run by farmers though so badgers get a fair hearing from proper studies before the government can properly ignore the science and cull anyway. Same with neonicotinoid pesticides but don't get me started...
I don't dispute the damage they cause but you need to do more than just cast your eyes over trees to see their full enviromental value.
Here is a study that suggests bird nest boxes are no substitute for natural tree cavities
https://www.ceh.ac.uk/news-and-medi...itute-crucial-role-tree-cavities-biodiversity
If grey squirrels are a crucial component in creating tree cavities through tree damage (I don't know if they are but that is kind of my point) then what wider impact would a total cull have on bird nesting numbers.
So X amount of millions is spend culling squirrels on one hand, Y amount of millions is spent on Goshawk and Pine Martin reintroduction on another hand, Z amount is being spent on trying to make better habitat for nesting birds and all these massive investments could all be in conflict with each other. Or not. but that is what the studies need to find out. You could invest all that money into trying to find acure or vaccination for squirrel pox instead and find that both animals can live along side each other (with local culls of greys where needed).