ChrisKavanaugh said:My point is that people get locked into almost a peer mindset of "keeping up with the Jones's" and buying premium gear because somehow it will make us swing like Tiger, drive like Juan or enjoy an evening fire and the night sky less somehow than Ray.
This has been bothering me quite a bit lately. But if I step back a bit and try to look at it objectively from someone who is new to the outdoors, I think Mears makes a pretty good role model and sometimes it takes years and lots of "dirttime" before people start to feel comfortable with their personal choices. I guess I feel more comfortable with folks going the "Ray Mears" route rather than pretending to be an expert and reciting everything they learned on the internet as gospel.
Probably more troubling to me than folks blindly following Ray Mears is the idea that bushcraft has some kind of ancient code that has to be followed. When I look at his site, I see all kinds of gear, from high tech to low tech. Not exactly an advertisement for primitive lifeways. Personally, and for mainly practical reasons, I like the idea of blending the new and the old but sometimes I think people forget that OVERALL, Ray Mears does not approach the outdoors with the same attitude towards primitive skills as someone like Larry Dean Olsen or John McPherson, to name a few. I don't see anything wrong with that. I'm just saying that "bushcraft" as it is generally practiced, is not defined necessarily by the gear you carry. Especially given the fact that Ray seems to carry and promote a lot of it.