Follow the sheeple or head for the hills?

Bug out or follow the sheeple?

  • I'd go to where the police sent me.

    Votes: 16 13.3%
  • I'd grab my rucksack and go bushcrafting.

    Votes: 104 86.7%

  • Total voters
    120
Status
Not open for further replies.

Greg

Full Member
Jul 16, 2006
4,335
260
Pembrokeshire
but certainly blaming it on the 'evil' corporations is a way of turning the blame away from ourselves.

I don't know what you read Mirius but I certainly didn't mention anything about 'EVIL' Corporations exploiting third world countries.
I work for the 2nd largest oil company in the world, and I know for a fact that they make alot of annual profit from, how do I put it, more tolerent countries around the world who don't have the strict emmission policies that we have here in the UK or in the States, where these countries would rather have the extra income of the US dollar, and don't care about the environment. The company has less operational restraints in these countries ie: Labour is cheaper, land costs are cheaper, taxes are less etc
It isn't exploitation its the economics of the particular country they operate in.

But at the end of the day everyone is entitled to there own opinion, you have your own and I have mine.

It will still go all T**ts up in the end no matter what!
 

JonnyP

Full Member
Oct 17, 2005
3,833
29
Cornwall...
People here are into it, because they like it, not because there is an overwhelming threat of anarchy, disaster or destruction. There is no justification, they just enjoy the fantasy.

.

Hi Martyn.....Got to pick you up on this mate, you are making assumptions and in my case you are wrong...I came into bushcraft because of being into survival, as it was called in the early eighties....I was worried about a cold war, I was nieve about the press in them days and I really thought it could all kick off and I was worried, so I started to learn survival stuff. I didn't really learn that much as things in the world cooled down again and I didnt have any money to buy all the stuff I wanted from survival aids, to practice with, but an interest in learning it all stayed with me and then good old Ray popped up.....I still think I should learn as much as I can, just in case it all kicks off in the world and I want to teach that to my kids as well, but, teaching it as a hobby, that is nowadays called bushcraft... I enjoy bushcraft. I really dont think I would enjoy survival. I am not in any fantasy....
 

scottishwolf

Settler
Oct 22, 2006
831
8
43
Ayr
personally i feel more comfortable in the woods than i do in the town most of the time so it would have to be : head for the hills :D i wish
 

Martyn

Bushcrafter through and through
Aug 7, 2003
5,252
33
59
staffordshire
www.britishblades.com
Hi Martyn.....Got to pick you up on this mate, you are making assumptions and in my case you are wrong...I came into bushcraft because of being into survival, as it was called in the early eighties....I was worried about a cold war, I was nieve about the press in them days and I really thought it could all kick off and I was worried, so I started to learn survival stuff. I didn't really learn that much as things in the world cooled down again and I didnt have any money to buy all the stuff I wanted from survival aids, to practice with, but an interest in learning it all stayed with me and then good old Ray popped up.....I still think I should learn as much as I can, just in case it all kicks off in the world and I want to teach that to my kids as well, but, teaching it as a hobby, that is nowadays called bushcraft... I enjoy bushcraft. I really dont think I would enjoy survival. I am not in any fantasy....

Hi John,

The following is not directed at you John, but generally...

There is nothing wrong with learning the skills to look after yourself in nature - that's why we are all here right? Aside from being simply fun, it is thought-provoking, interesting and stimulating. But paranoia breeds paranoia. Nothing is going to "kick-off", we are not facing down armageddon, we are not on the brink of the apocalypse and we are not trying to survive the wholsale destruction of mankind. ...But even if we were, there is a difference between making good as best you can in the event and tooling up with a twitch, ready to go when it hits the fan. The former is necessary, the latter is sociopathic.

It's taken several thousand bloody and painful years for our society to reach the point we are at. It's not perfect by any means, but in Britain today, few (if any) people are starving, few die from lack of shelter or warmth (though it does happen) and most are warm, secure, comfortable and free. An apocalyptic event (lets say a meterorite crash) would plunge the world back into the stoneage. Man is a social, tribal animal, he is intelligent, creative, warlike, heirarchical, agressive, selfish and ruthless. There would be no place in this brave new world for police, justice, ambulances, health workers, doctors, the dole etc. The old would die, the sick would die, the weak would die, the lazy would die, children would die and the healthy would hide or fight. It would be a hand to mouth, desperate, miserable, miserable existance. That would continue for a very, very long time untill all the survivors learned the hard way, why we need a legal system, why we need a health service, why we have hospitals and why we have the dole.

The best even an acomplished bushcrafter could hope for - would be to survive. But what a life? It most definitely would not be a utopian unshackleing from the rat race. It would not be an adventure and it would not be exciting. What person in thier right mind would wish this upon us? Our society as we know it today is not perfect, but it's a helluva lot better than anything that would be left after an apocalypse.

But some people dont think that. Some people think that the apocalypse would bring them the freedom to live thier lives the way they want to live. How wrong can a person possibly be?. It's madness.

But survivalism aside, with regard to our flood scenario....

We are human beings and most of us feel some empathy for those less fortunate than ourselves. Our scenario is not the apocalypse, it's a flood. Public order will not be lost, society will not end it is simply a deeply upsetting, but temporary displacement. You have two choices. Stay and help those less fortunate. Your help would be welcome because in the short-term, the emergency services would be completely overwhelmed. You could help by making sure the old folks were warm, by keeping people calm, by giving out blankets or water, making tea, finding something for Mrs Jones' baby to use for a nappy, helping the fire brigade pull people from the water, helping keep order, any number of things where you, as an individual, could help your neighbours ...the sheep(le), to make the best of this pretty miserable event.

Or, you can leg it to the hills. Not only is that a deeply unsociable and selfish act, but those who do care about your life, would be burdened with having to think about your safety even if you dont. While you are out there playing at apocalypses, togged out in yer camo gear with yer woodlore between ya teeth, the emergency services would be working overtime to try and keep tabs on who is where and you would not be helping.

Have you stopped to think what situation would exist if everyone legged it to the hills? What if the fire fighters, doctors, nurses etc all said "bugger-em ...I'm off"? Is that something you would want? Perhaps one of the bushcrafters legging it to the hills could nominate someone to stay behind to look after the sick, the old, the young etc?

There is only one sane thing to do, help those who cant help themselves and work to make sure our society doesnt fall apart. Leave the survivalist fantasies for sunday afternoon bushcrafting, because in the event, you are either part of the solution or part of the problem.
 

Goose

Need to contact Admin...
Aug 5, 2004
1,797
21
57
Widnes
www.mpowerservices.co.uk
Martyn, I know where you are coming from and agree with most of what you say generally. I am not sure what the area is like you live in, or what the people are like around you, I think that you would be part of "the authorities"(that is in no way meant to be derogatory) due to your job.
I am in an urban area, not a bad area by any means but urban, there are some good people around and there are some that aren't(worked with teens and seen both sides, the good ones give me a little hope for the future, the bad ones make me worry for the good!), I think the indifferent are in the majority and in most situations they usually find it easier to follow the bad:( . I would not be part of any rescue/care team and don't know how I could be, i know there are St Johns and the like, but I am already a scout leader and time is scarce even for scouting:eek: . I don't know if any help I could give would be welcomed, allowed or lead me to be ing locked up!
I do have skills that would be useful but how would I prove them and would the authorities welcome an "I can do that" stranger turning up and trying to help?
So even taking in what you say, I am off and enjoying a couple of days in the woods till things calmed down, probably helping along the way, away from major numbers of people which the authorities seem to concentrate on and miss the small groups or individuals! Perhaps thats where I would be best deployed!?
 

Greg

Full Member
Jul 16, 2006
4,335
260
Pembrokeshire
There is only one sane thing to do, help those who cant help themselves and work to make sure our society doesnt fall apart. Leave the survivalist fantasies for sunday afternoon bushcrafting, because in the event, you are either part of the solution or part of the problem.

You need to pull in the reins a bit here Martin, not everyone thinks like this and why should they?
When I was a young squaddie, I was driving out to an exercise area in the North of England, I was one of 15 lads in the back of a 4-tonne truck. we were caught in a traffic jam which was caused by a 5 car pile up. When we got to it there was one police car and no-one else, he just happened to be on the road when the accident happened. Our SNCO approached him and told him that there was 2 Medics in the truck who could help, he flatly turned their help down although there was multiple casualties. He just said the fire brigade and ambulance crews were on their way and wouldn't let us near the crash site.

So that is why I wouldn't try and get involved because alot, not all, of emergency services peolpe have the same attitude!! They only ever want the forces to intervene when the s**t really hits the fan!
 

Martyn

Bushcrafter through and through
Aug 7, 2003
5,252
33
59
staffordshire
www.britishblades.com
Martyn, I know where you are coming from and agree with most of what you say generally. I am not sure what the area is like you live in, or what the people are like around you, I think that you would be part of "the authorities"(that is in no way meant to be derogatory) due to your job.

I live in a slightly nicer part of an otherwise economically deprived, large city. Some people are good - most I would say, some people are not.

If all the good, fit & healthy people go to the hills, who would be left?

There are many ways that you can help, I'm not talking about being an action hero, just being there would be enough.
 

mr dazzler

Native
Aug 28, 2004
1,722
83
uk
So that is why I wouldn't try and get involved because alot, not all, of emergency services peolpe have the same attitude!! They only ever want the forces to intervene when the s**t really hits the fan!

I can see what your saying, its to do with profssional pride or rivalry possibly or just crass nancy people H&S directives? That was like the fire chief of tewlesbury who sort of "implied" only trained fire personell should pump flood water out, and then only after a risk assessment. It reminds me of the dad army episode where the german airmen are in the town hall holding hostages, and they all argue outside, its a job for this lot or that lot, we'll have to call so and so....in the meantime mannering and his men improvise, get on and do the job:rolleyes: :) . Theres all these industries now isnt there-the education industry, the health industry, the sociology industry, the leisure industry. I suppose they all like to protect their interests and assert their indespensability. But your incident was just one minor one (no offense to those involved and I hope they recovered OK) In a real crisis I think there would be less rigidity regards PC/H&S/strict "role demarcation" etc, more like if you can do it fine. (was that pile up on the A66 by any chance going from Catterick to otter burn; it was a real bad road back in the 70's when I used it a lot, Bowes Moor etc, but I think its safer now?)

cheers Jonathan:)
 

TheGreenMan

Native
Feb 17, 2006
1,000
8
beyond the pale
Hi John,

The following is not directed at you John, but generally...

There is nothing wrong with learning the skills to look after yourself in nature - that's why we are all here right? Aside from being simply fun, it is thought-provoking, interesting and stimulating. But paranoia breeds paranoia. Nothing is going to "kick-off", we are not facing down armageddon, we are not on the brink of the apocalypse and we are not trying to survive the wholsale destruction of mankind. ...But even if we were, there is a difference between making good as best you can in the event and tooling up with a twitch, ready to go when it hits the fan. The former is necessary, the latter is sociopathic.

It's taken several thousand bloody and painful years for our society to reach the point we are at. It's not perfect by any means, but in Britain today, few (if any) people are starving, few die from lack of shelter or warmth (though it does happen) and most are warm, secure, comfortable and free. An apocalyptic event (lets say a meterorite crash) would plunge the world back into the stoneage. Man is a social, tribal animal, he is intelligent, creative, warlike, heirarchical, agressive, selfish and ruthless. There would be no place in this brave new world for police, justice, ambulances, health workers, doctors, the dole etc. The old would die, the sick would die, the weak would die, the lazy would die, children would die and the healthy would hide or fight. It would be a hand to mouth, desperate, miserable, miserable existance. That would continue for a very, very long time untill all the survivors learned the hard way, why we need a legal system, why we need a health service, why we have hospitals and why we have the dole.

The best even an acomplished bushcrafter could hope for - would be to survive. But what a life? It most definitely would not be a utopian unshackleing from the rat race. It would not be an adventure and it would not be exciting. What person in thier right mind would wish this upon us? Our society as we know it today is not perfect, but it's a helluva lot better than anything that would be left after an apocalypse.

But some people dont think that. Some people think that the apocalypse would bring them the freedom to live thier lives the way they want to live. How wrong can a person possibly be?. It's madness.

But survivalism aside, with regard to our flood scenario....

We are human beings and most of us feel some empathy for those less fortunate than ourselves. Our scenario is not the apocalypse, it's a flood. Public order will not be lost, society will not end it is simply a deeply upsetting, but temporary displacement. You have two choices. Stay and help those less fortunate. Your help would be welcome because in the short-term, the emergency services would be completely overwhelmed. You could help by making sure the old folks were warm, by keeping people calm, by giving out blankets or water, making tea, finding something for Mrs Jones' baby to use for a nappy, helping the fire brigade pull people from the water, helping keep order, any number of things where you, as an individual, could help your neighbours ...the sheep(le), to make the best of this pretty miserable event.

Or, you can leg it to the hills. Not only is that a deeply unsociable and selfish act, but those who do care about your life, would be burdened with having to think about your safety even if you dont. While you are out there playing at apocalypses, togged out in yer camo gear with yer woodlore between ya teeth, the emergency services would be working overtime to try and keep tabs on who is where and you would not be helping.

Have you stopped to think what situation would exist if everyone legged it to the hills? What if the fire fighters, doctors, nurses etc all said "bugger-em ...I'm off"? Is that something you would want? Perhaps one of the bushcrafters legging it to the hills could nominate someone to stay behind to look after the sick, the old, the young etc?

There is only one sane thing to do, help those who cant help themselves and work to make sure our society doesnt fall apart. Leave the survivalist fantasies for sunday afternoon bushcrafting, because in the event, you are either part of the solution or part of the problem.

This post now gets my vote as the best so far (for what that’s worth). BlackPacker’s post #227 had it all for me, but you have added a great deal to the debate with this one.

You and BlackPacker are, I feel, great humanitarians, and I say, bravo, to you both!

You both have my greatest respect, with your respective insights and understanding.

Best regards,
Paul.
 

scoops_uk

Nomad
Feb 6, 2005
497
19
54
Jurassic Coast
Martyn,

That was a fantastic post. (#244)

I think the only place we might disagree is on how likely a significant breakdown of social order might be and to be frank, I hope you're right.

My final thought to everyone is this, you might seriously consider what you put in your first aid kit and how you would deal with a severed artery. You might discuss the kit and it's use. You might have a strategy for getting to the nearest hospital. That doesn't mean you want to stab yourself in the leg.

Scoops
 

TheGreenMan

Native
Feb 17, 2006
1,000
8
beyond the pale
...I think the only place we might disagree is on how likely a significant breakdown of social order might be and to be frank, I hope you're right.

My final thought to everyone is this, you might seriously consider what you put in your first aid kit and how you would deal with a severed artery. You might discuss the kit and it's use. You might have a strategy for getting to the nearest hospital. That doesn't mean you want to stab yourself in the leg...

Sublime, simply, sublime. Finally, this thread is beginning to rock! Rather like the human race, at it’s finest, when facing the worst.

Thank you, Scoops.

Best regards,
Paul.
 

British Red

M.A.B (Mad About Bushcraft)
Dec 30, 2005
26,887
2,140
Mercia
I think the only place we might disagree is on how likely a significant breakdown of social order might be and to be frank, I hope you're right.

My final thought to everyone is this, you might seriously consider what you put in your first aid kit and how you would deal with a severed artery. You might discuss the kit and it's use. You might have a strategy for getting to the nearest hospital. That doesn't mean you want to stab yourself in the leg.

Scoops

Spot on Scoops thats the best explanation I have heard in a long time.

Its the same as insurance - you might acknowledge the possibility of your house catching fire, you may even pay a premium to mitigate some of the worst effects on you family should the worst happen. The fact of acknowledging its possibility doesn't mean you want it to happen - quite the reverse - you will do everything in your power to prevent its happening and its the last thing you would ever want for you or anyone else. What you have done is thought about, tried to prevent it, tried to mitigate its effects on your family should it occur despite your best efforts. You still dread it though

Red
 

British Red

M.A.B (Mad About Bushcraft)
Dec 30, 2005
26,887
2,140
Mercia
No Idea Paul, my thoughts are the same as they always has been. I have home insurance because, try as they might, the police cannot prevent my home from being broken into. I have an alarm to try to prevent it and insurance in case it does.

I carry a first aid kit in my pack and a larger one in my car. I have never needed the one in my car for myself, but I have done for several others when "first on scene".

I have health insurance because the NHS has not been able to provide the quality or immediacy of treatment my family have needed. I hoped not to need it but it has proven to be a wise investment since we did.

As Martyn has stated - the authorities have been overwhelmed in the recent UK floods - as they were in Carlisle, as they were after the large storms etc. I have thought through what I might need in these temporary blips on lifes road and taken a few basic precautions to make sure that my family are well provided for when normal services are interrupted and don't place an unnecessary strain on the already overstretched resources available. rather like having had my operation done privately rather than on the NHS. If you can leave emergency care for those least able to provide for themselves I believe its the responsible thing to do. I prefer to be as self reliant and ecologically sensitive as possible -thats always been my position. I have no wish to ever see the normal service of our nation break down - I dread it. But I acknowledge the possibility that the government cannot have infinitely scalable plans for an infinite range of disasters - they are limited as are we all by funds. That is and always has been my thoughts on the subject

Red
 

TheGreenMan

Native
Feb 17, 2006
1,000
8
beyond the pale
No Idea Paul...

I do, Red. And it’s this, despite the widely differing views that have been expressed, and the differing experiences that we all have had, there is a universal theme emerging, and this is, our humanity. I can’t help feeling that this thread is beginning to achieve some sense of peace, and through that I believe that a consensus of a kind is happening.

Perhaps this is just the effect upon me of today’s glorious blue sky, or the gold coloured moon in the still air of the London night sky, or the Cabernet Sauvignon speaking, who knows?

And I’m very sad to hear of all the personal difficulties you have been going through, and I guess this is what colours each of our perceptions of the world, to a great extent, which in turn creates the illusion that we are all different, when in fact we are all the same.

My thoughts tonight are with Becky, who is embarrassed, that she made herself sound like the kind of person that she fears. I hope that where ever you are, Becky that the moonlight and the wine can work its magic on you too.

All the best,
Paul.
 
M

mrsfiremaker

Guest
Paul, thank you for your kind words. I didn’t mean I wouldn’t be around awhile because of embarrassment. I came up to post last week on my days off, Thursday, ½ of Friday and Saturday. I have been busy 18-20 hours a day since. I have been able to pop in and read a few pots here and there but have lacked the time to reply. You know, when I read,
I hope that where ever you are, Becky that the moonlight and the wine can work its magic on you too.
, I was actually boiling some berries and had made just made a comment to Darrel about making wine instead of jam. Thank you for your kindness and understanding.

About this thread, I am more frustrated with the same old internet frustration, not being able to say things with the face expressions attached to that. When I try to add something to get the feeling across, nobody sees it as that. They think its just crazy talk. My whole point was simply, Wouldn’t you question a bunch of random people doing something so radical yet the same? I don’t believe in this random because our genes say to stay with our village or we’ll be eaten by the lions. And how do you help a group of people when you physically don’t have the means to help all of them by yourself? That’s all. It just went too far, trying to think about it. And it wasn’t necessary. But I would want to teach them to help themselves, a very non-selfish answer as trying to would only cause all involved more problems.

I have spent some time reevaluating the scenario and really putting it into play as to the area where I live. We do not have so much of a direct threat to a flood in out immediate area but that and the wildfires are a gloomy threat to the north of us, putting us in its line of devastation if the “if” occurred. But you all are right. You are facing this direct threat right now, Im not. So how do I put it into a context that I understand? How do people around here really deal with things? First off, our economy is fed by tourism. And based on past experiences that have been repeating themselves for years, I know just how our local authorities would deal with it. Our population at least doubles in the summer months. We just do not have the resources to provide adequate shelter for everyone. The people first evacuated would be those that live in the cabins on the lakes, for obvious reasons of being flooded first and the fact that if our authorities don’t handle the situation right according to them, they will not return next year to hand feed us their money. And the people who live here, they will have to come back so the authority would not spend much time on us. They may drive by and say you had better leave and leave us to fend for ourselves but they would not be providing US with the resources we have been paying for. And I can see the devastation that many of them cause to our environments. They are tearing down more trees to build second or third homes the live in one or two weeks out of the year, bring exotic plants and animal species to our lakes and streams, they pollute, they get the right away, they should be the first in line, ect, ect. I already know how they treat our resources and how they feel that they are more important to than we are.

I remember as a kid, we lived in the country, 2 miles from the highway. My uncle lived half a mile further than us. He worked with the country snowplowing in the winter. Our schools would not face the dangers for us children and would run the buses anyway, and open the school at least for three hours, long enough to provide us with a lunch, so that the school could get a full days worth of funding. Our route ran to my uncles home and turned around there to head back to the highway. My uncle, knowing that the school bus would get stuck, got up even earlier than he had to, to plow out his driveway just enough for the bus to turn around, and just dropped his plow to plow one side of the dirt road on his way to work. He then headed off to his first destination, to the golf course where the retired people, who could sit and sip coffee all day, got plowed first. You know what happened? My uncle nearly lost his job. His boss had told him to “Come in as soon as you can,” and if he had 20 extra minutes to do what he did, he could have made it to that golf course sooner to plow the rich people out, at 4 am, before anyone one them would have thought of getting out of bed! AND so that I could later hear some of them complain that the plows woke them up! I remember there would be a cold advisory, frost bite could happen in as little as five minutes. But those buses would still run. Less than half the parents would have the sense to keep their kids home but the rest would send us off. The unplowed rods left us stuck many times waiting to be pulled out. I remember one particular day, the bus got stuck on a sharp slippery curve where the engine just died. “For our safety” we were not allowed to leave the bus but were stuck there to somehow be missed by the dump trucks, not expecting us to be sitting freezing on the other side, would take the corner as safely as possible in the middle of the road. I mean, who would be out in the stuff right? They were on the way to get sand for the roads. We sat shivering for over an hour and a half while the parents that could see the bus would walk out and get their kids. They would call the other parents to let them know what was going on but had no way to reach their kids anyway. But the tow trucks were off pulling out the rich people so the children sat freezing. Then they took us to school anyway, and an hour later we were sent home!

We live in a low area so we would be one of the first flooded. To answer the first question to exactly what we would do, we wouldn’t wait until we were racing the floods to get to higher ground. We’d leave before the authorities arrived. We live in a low importance area. After a snow now, I know that just one mile away, roads are clear, we can hear the traffic in the winter stillness but we have waited until evening to be plowed. And that in itself was a danger for a woman pregnant in her last month. Where would we go? Somewhere were we could get regular updates on the weather patterns to continue our safety, North-East an hour to where my sister’s mom lives or two hours to the south where my sister lives. Since our town is divided by the Mississippi, we would want to head East of that in dire emergency.

I started more to reply to posts directly but I'll post that in a minute.

Becky
 
M

mrsfiremaker

Guest
ok, everytime Ive been up to try and post a reply, I get pulled away so Ive been saving it up and adding to it whenever I get a chance. Think ill of me if you must, forgive me if you might, just know I have nothing against even one person here.

Seriously, If I woke up and there was a guy with a FEMA shirt banging at my front door, I'd probably run out the back door.

(insert hand clappy smiley)

"It's not their fault, they don't know what they are supposed to do. Their government hasn't shown them the way!" Have there been any advice adverts shown on tv?

My biggest problem with parenting these days. If simple life skills were passed onto children, there would be no need for this. And I just read in Time, (not my favorite magazine but hey, it was better than People over lunch, and their were boys shooting a bow and using a lighter to start a wilderness fire) but I was reading that in the 60’s parents spent 11 hours a week with their kids and now its up to 20. I would have liked to see how they spent those hours and seen another study that compared how much time kids spent joining their parents, learning to do things like set the table, cook, organize a social gathering, ect. They do more shopping and video game playing and little to do with learning because being a kid “should be just fun“ because they “spend enough time learning in school” and “kids shouldn’t have to work, ah, come on, let them be a kid.” Learning skills is what being a kid is about. But now fire drills are being practiced in schools so why wouldn’t other aspects move onto that as well? Because they don’t want the kids to be afraid of something that is all around them. I don’t believe in this sheltering people from reality. That’s why they freak out in situations as you all have been experiencing. But then again, I may not trust how society might chose to teach it. They’ve done a great job making people believe that the bacteria in their home environments is actually more harmful then the chemicals they spread around to kill it.

but I think that the IQ level of british people isn't that high!

Now this is uncalled for. I have seen my share of stupid people of here. I work retail, I could go on and on.

Becky, we live in different countries with different cultures. We may speak the same language, but really we are as foreign to one another as any other country. You may have experiences which justify some elements of survivalism, but you'd have to come and live in England to really appreciate how daft and out of context the import is for us. You have Chicago, we have Llandudno. You've got Los Angeles, we've got Tenby on Sea. Worlds apart Becky. We have had some very bad floods - some of the worst this country has ever seen, but even that doesnt come anywhere near close to the devastation you saw in New Orleans. Generally speaking, our police and army are competant, caring professions - even now in 2007 our police are not armed. It's a different world.

I agree, we are worlds apart. In fact I agree with everything you have said here. While I would definitely enjoy the atmosphere while with those in the UK as there are here, I could not justify self ignorance and spend my life in a bubble pretending that bad isn’t out there. My job as a parent is to teach my children how to look for and prevent bad situations from arising. Not all bad people rise to the ranks as some of the powerful people we have and continue to see. They are one in 20 to 25 and slick as butter. You don’t even know you’ve met them unless you get really close to them. But you are right in the terms you can not go looking for it.

New Orleans was a horrid experience. Though I feel for the people who still endure this tragedy, I can not comprehend some of their lack of ability to think for themselves. There was a little 12 year old boy hanging on for dear life with his mother as the water rose inside their home. They fought for life but finally the mother fatigued and sank. The boy at this time did as any mammal would in such a situation, he started to think for himself. He grabbed a breath, dove into the water and swam out of the window the water was rushing in from to the outside where he finally was able to be rescued. The biggest tragedy wasn’t the way our support groups responded, it was the lack of response from those waiting for someone to help them, waiting out for their own deaths with highly held expectations of someone giving them the help rather than getting out of the way so others who truly could not fend for themselves could be helped.

Our police and army are also competent caring individuals. Our opinion are very twisted here and that is the biggest problem, besides them being fueled by our media. We bring them down verbally, refuse to fund them, raise our children to hate them, will freely use their services, and then hate them more when disaster strikes, even if everything goes picture perfect because they did not prevent the tragedy in the first place. As far as crime goes, it’s the diversity and lack of tolerance that is the problem. Take away the guns and the problem still remains. The only real comment I have about the guns is look at Switzerland.

I agree, I feel this is what some of the members who live outside the UK don’t understand (and I’m really referring to some of the US membership here - By the way, some of the most interesting posts I’ve read on this site are from Americans, Canadians, Scandinavians, Europeans and the Antipodeans and those in the Far East.). As you say, the culture and society in the US is very different, and more diverse in terms of climate, than that in the UK ( but that’s not to say we don’t have a lot in common, in many respects). I admire much about the American people and their cultural traditions.

Nothing is going to "kick-off", we are not facing down armageddon, we are not on the brink of the apocalypse and we are not trying to survive the wholsale destruction of mankind. .

What was it my minister was telling me all my life? I think it had to do with the end of the world as we know it. Realistically, it is something that we all have thought about to varying degrees.

To answer all of this:

Because of the diversity in America, there are million small cultures, depending on the side of the city, town, woodland or side of the country you are standing on. What are our traditions? The holidays we celebrate have to do with celebrating our war veterans and our victories in war, our first encounters with Native Americans as well as traditional European religious holidays. How do we celebrate similar holidays. Do you all do the same things even? Do you all have Black Friday? People here are seen in a crowd squished body to body to try and get one of the latest toys that TV told them was hot this year. They fight and scream at each other. Its no wonder kids throw a fit if they don’t get it for Christmas. They learn that attitude from their parents. I work in retail and this tradition is taken a little differently. Everyone lines up and we hand out tickets for the cheap stuff. Then have two or three back up plans for those who are willing to take the next best deal. But even here, I was run into by a crazed woman driving her car while I was crossing the iced street to my car at 5 months pregnant. We were fine and it was barely a tap by the time the woman decided to break but still. Our American born traditions are fed by madness, money, and a desire to own our freedom while suppressing the freedom of other humans. They have never been fed by deep rooted cultural connections that bring our communities together in a common bonding and understanding.

Don’t get me wrong, up here we have some fun traditions in the various towns. Bean hole days (more our speed, beans are cooked for a few days in a big pot in the ground to perfection), wood tick races, turtle races, (I don’t know what this one is called but here it goes…) Dress up like an idiot such as wearing toilet plungers over your shoes and head, wear a speedo, or other weirdness, in the WINTER and jump into a big hole in the ice on the lake, (Ok, its amusing, but I didn’t say that), car racing on the ice, demolition derby’s---REDNECK gatherings, (I aint never gone to ‘un :rolleyes: ), fireworks on the 4 of July, County fairs, and motorcycle gatherings. (Ive got some pics to share from the last week once I get them all in one place.)

SURVIVAL, BUSHCRAFT, and in general, the ways of the Amish are the traditions that we can look to if we want to go deeper than that to a life that is not that far back. To the days when we had to learn how another people thought when we could not speak with them, or learn about plants that we did not recognize, or get use to the flavor of meat we had never tasted before, to look for that freedom we could have never dreamed of in Europe. To make our own tools and toys and beer. To make our own clothes, build our own homes, and show our children the value and pride taken in hard work. Surviving poverty and racial or religious prejudices, trying to offer something deeper to our children when our parents themselves worked hard through the 60’s and 80’s to strip that connection they had with that heritage, are now the traditions many in my generation are looking for. Pop culture is a joke, a glamorous lie, a poorly painted mask that we use to define ourselves in order to be like everyone else rather to truly show that many are reaching inside to find that something different, while at the same time each making stronger opinions that drive each other further away.

You might believe technology is the solution to save the day (such as big "space mirrors" reflecting away all that nasty sunlight and cool the planet a bit), I'm not convinced. I think we need to change the way we live, to reduce the rate we consume resources and to live a simpler life. I'm doing my best to do that I'm one of those cycle to work, recycle everything, organic box scheme nutters.

Unfortunately, I'm in a minority and that leads me to fear that those who think a 4.2 litre turbocharged 4x4 is perfect for a 1 mile school run are going to bankrupt us ecologically speaking. I'm not wishing "doomsday" on anyone, far from that I'm doing all I can. I'm scared that I'm in a minority and a lot of very smart people keep trying to tell us time is *really* running out. After all, a lot of UK crops are ruined this year (I know this because I rely on locally sourced produce) Crops are failing elsewhere too, we might not be able to rely on buying food in from around the globe.

We also feel the devastation. Our yard is brown. We worry about gathering wild foods because the animals need it more. Our corn is suppose to be “knee high by the fourth of July” and it was short enough to see the wilted stalks across each field as we drive by.

It will take one of the big companies doing something notably small to rub our faces in our own shame, and to also show us just how easy this change can be done. We place the responsibility on the oil companies. But it is us who buy it. I truly believe that oil will become the way of VHS and Beta. Everyone wants the latest technology, yet not the highest quality, because cheap is more important. We need to advertise, create competition, show how popular the better way is, and make it affordable, and smaller. That is the only way to win, and it is technology that is already available to us.

I know this is much more complex than this, but say we tap into all the trends that people are interested in right now. Reality TV is popular. If we can get people to watch the ridiculousness of one show, then see a huge boom in copycat shows, and then have people copy what they see in them (such as fear factors contests at my work), I think we could do it this way too. What if Discovery Channel for example took one of the poorest communities in the fuel hungry US and showed a transformation from fuel to energy…in just one year or less? They could show the type of time frames that our governments should be looking at, months vs. years. They could show just how easy it would take to get a community involved. They could show it can be done more cheaply than most realize. Another aspect could be a contest to design the coolest alternative techno-cars for the opportunity for a large industry to create. It would be compatible with all the latest and greatest technology products from Cell phones that will work in your car when you plug them into the car speaker system for a real hand free, volume controllable device, to built in navigation systems and dvd players in the back for the kids. I know they have already done this but I have never seen a season long effort of people trying to make that difference, being able to connect with the day to day struggles and successes of such an effort, make us see the value of the extra money spent. OR how about this one. UK vs. US to see which poor town in each country could beat the other, meet the deadlines and see what creativity creates through the competition. Right now money and power are speaking, keeping the people from believing in a conspiracy that would provoke a change.

But honestly, I see children making the change. They are asking what we are doing to their future. They are holding us accountable, one small step at a time. I saw a little 9 year old handing our tire gauges and teaching adults how to pump their tires up. I know a woman who’s 13 year old college niece is building a car that runs off wind, solar, and battery power and plans to patent it. I see my children ask questions. And outraged when they see someone else being just stupid in public. I should probably tell my daughter to mind her own business. But I believe she is. I should tell her to not be rude. But I feel it is the other person who is, so I tell my daughter, “You are right and go ahead and say what you need to.” There is nothing more shaming then being held accountable by a child.

At least if the ‘doomsday’ comes, or comes earlier than many of us expect, and if it can’t be avoided, then at least those of us here who have played a part in the revival of the crafts of previous generations, will have done something (however modest) to prepare our children and grandchildren to cope with, to some extent, if as you say, we convey those interests, and the skills and knowledge to the next generation of ‘bushcrafters’.

No comment needed.

Becky
 

Yorkshire Boy

Tenderfoot
Jan 30, 2007
96
0
England/Japan
I would grab sleeping bags, mats, bog roll and food and go to the school.

Far easier to tell my loved ones that I was safe if I was there.

I'm going to start a new thread because I'm in Japan and we have earthquakes.

JC.
 

commandocal

Nomad
Jul 8, 2007
425
0
UK
I personally would go to the woods closest to me my bergen is always packed and i can swim pretty good too,... so i would go grab my shorts aswell :p
 

Angus Og

Full Member
Nov 6, 2004
1,035
3
Glasgow
Follow the sheeple or head for the hills?

One question

What makes you think you'd be welcomed in the hills?

They may look empty but there not and the people who live there will fight for what they have.

If you wont help your neighbour way should they help you.:confused:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

BCUK Shop

We have a a number of knives, T-Shirts and other items for sale.

SHOP HERE