Exactly my thoughts Santaman.. wonder what Fred Bear would say about the matter if he was still alive.
Sent from my GT-I8552 using Tapatalk
Sent from my GT-I8552 using Tapatalk
If someone copies you then perhaps copyright breech but in most cases....Bear, Apple, Mac Donald etc surely those names were already in use before people started trying to lay claim to them, talk about ego inflation and if Grylls wins this he can have his bloody signed photo back. Maybe I should claim the name 'Hog' Dont get it..
Well it looks like it was personally down to BG that the legal action was stopped. So kudos to him for stepping in. Seems we've been giving him undeserved abuse. Not the first time, and certainly not the last.
[QUOTEHe's shown such an interest in the small company that they're going to send him one of their knives as thanks. But you won't be seeing that one on the TV]
Why kudos to Bear for stopping what should never have been started?
It was however done in his name by his representatives. Whilst he may not have instructed the company to do it, he is the person who is ultimately responsible for what is done on behalf of his company.
I hold the MD and shareholders responsible for the actions of Tesco. I hold Grylls responsible for the actions of the company he owns and sets the policies for.
It is good that he stopped a malicious action. It would have been much better had his firm not started it.
Well it looks like it was personally down to BG that the legal action was stopped. So kudos to him for stepping in. Seems we've been giving him undeserved abuse. Not the first time, and certainly not the last.