Indeed....the new variant has supplanted the previous strain but I don't think the message is getting across, the situation isn't the same as it was last spring, it's worse.That's not a good idea in this present situation. Especially not a good idea when the new variant is very, very much more infectious.
The new variant has indeed made the problem worse but the current rules are so vague and have so many holes in them that we are going to have to take individual responsibility for our own safety and the safety of others.
It is ludicrous that two young women were fined for having a secluded and distanced walk with a takeaway coffee.
It is similarly ludicrous that the Lake District still has a crazy number of camper vans and tourists on the roads.
What makes me think twice about the guidelines are that all those extra people on the Lake District roads could be "travelling for work".
The regulation which requires arrivals into the UK to have a recent negative Covid test weirdly doesn't apply to truck drivers, as if they are somehow immune.
The albeit very loose rules are constantly changing and open to interpretation by individuals, so the general public are just as entitled to make a mistake in their interpretation as police officers are. The difference is that the police can issue fines based on their (possibly) erroneous understanding of the ever-shifting non-binding rules.
It's a minefield. I sympathise with police officers trying hard to understand the spirit of the rules but I do find it interesting that they chose to fine two young women rather than two older men or perhaps a larger group. If they want to set an example it seems that this wasn't a good one.
Look after yourself and your loved ones. As far as anyone else is concerned, wear the mask, leave 2m and wash your hands regularly. If we all did that there wouldn't be a problem with two women 2m apart in the open air having a walk.
Really, I read that they came from 30mins away from each other to meet up.
I wonder just how the police who issued them feel now ?
Bet they won't bother trying hard to enforce anything.......
That's the best you've got, is it?
So you think that if they're hungry, the only answer to that is, during a time of a pandemic when being indoors with lots of people, to go indoors and sit down with a group of people? Especially when their job is to prevent other people doing just that because 'that's what they've been told to do'?
If the local staion has no canteen then I would hope the local station would find alternative arrangements (packed lunch, anyone?) rather than point their staff toward the one solution that contravenes everything we've been told, that said staff are meant to be preventing others from doing, and that antagonises the spread of the virus. Wouldn't you?
Yes.
If it's that much of a risk then joining other strangers indoors to eat yoru egg and chips is a bad idea for everyone.
Surely that's the point, isn't it?
There doesn't appear to be a great deal of difference between pre-lockdown & lockdown.I was going to post the BBC link about Bournemouth but Toddy beat me to it.
I live in Bournemouth/Poole area and even though there are a lot of people out and about, MOST are acting sensibly.
This is a statement from a BCP email/newsletter posted on 06/01/21
'We are carefully following the government’s stated advice which says leaving home for exercise is reasonable and is permitted once a day, in places such as parks, beaches, countryside accessible to the public, forests, public gardens, the grounds of a heritage site and playgrounds. Whilst we have excellent provision of these spaces in the BCP area, not everyone is fortunate enough to live within easy walking or cycling distance of them, and government advice therefore permits people to travel locally for exercise, including to access public open space.
Everyone must take personal responsibility for their own actions to combat the spread of COVID-19. Wherever we take our outdoor exercise, this means carefully observing social distancing and maintaining good hand hygiene. If places appear too busy, people should head elsewhere in their local area in order to help protect themselves and others.'
Community Safety
Households must avoid mixing. You cannot leave your home to meet socially with anyone you do not live with or are not in a support bubble with (if you are legally permitted to form one).
You may exercise outdoors with one other person, but you must maintain social distancing at all times.
Any breaches of the regulations such as households mixing inside or gatherings should be reported online wherever possible. You can also report online to Dorset Police.
All pretty enlightened & sensible information really.
I don't know any country specifics but that I think about sums it up for Europe. What gets me is that (here)even the scientists are presenting an almost incoherent set of information. Medical scientists are basically repeating that "that has not been studied" well that is not even an opinion. Then there seems to be government science that surprisingly tends to follow the policies enforced at the moment. Just a few weeks ago the head of local "National Institute for Health and Welfare of Finland" which in spite of it's name is totally working with sicknesses stated that maybe it was a mistake to follow WHO lead. Slightly late now.I don't think many people realise that a whole lot of hard work has gone into looking at the science behind many aspects of how sars-cov-2 is spread and how we might best mitigated against its spread. Loads of people are working flat out to make sense of every piece of new information, to put that into context and turn it into something that a layperson can understand. That information is contintuously updated and fed to government of all levels, who then have the unenviable job of deciding what limitations to put in place. Inevitably there will be compromises and when the public questions why this is allowed but not that, they often don't realise that there has been a lot of weighing up of risks, costs, likelihood of compliance etc behind those restrictions. And that we are often given more freedom than would be good for us, just to keep people on-side a bit more. Unfortunately, the people in power also often don't act on advice in time (for various reasons, I'm sure) even if the scientific community has been flagging likely problems for months. Having seen some of what goes on behind the scenes, I find it really sad and annoying that people are blame the scientists for being tardy, when they are not the ones dragging their feet.