To put things in perspective, refering the orginal story the same size cat on another road could of stood a chance of trip home in the boot and ending up as dinner. I make no apoligies if you find that unpallatable. The only thing that has ever stopped road kill cat getting on the menu is that there will be some human morning the cats loss. I dont think a life or a death should be wasted, and I have no issues eating road kill. It is in the same vane that I dont have an issue eating horse. They have got to the end of their useful life, I dont think the meat should be wasted. We only have an objection to horse meat because we see their emotional range and view them as some how higher than the dinner plate.
Horses and dogs and to some extent cats show emotions we as humans can see and empathise with. Dogs emotions are very easy for us to see, until we miss read them, dont respect the fact they are pack carnivores with differant social rules and then we get bitten. More people get killed by cows [not sure this is total fact] than by dogs but we have a perception that cows are docile. We can't read the emotions of cows, chickens and sheep very well, which seemly makes them easier to eat. We seem to get into a moral quandry if we think an animal is capable of feeling emotion especially grief or pain that maybe we shouldnt eat it. This one point is what separates us from every other animal. No other animals makes a moral choice to make kill as fast, as painless, or less distressing. The speed of a kill is due not wasting energy in every other preditor apart from us.
Animals dont question whether an animal has feelings if it threatens their food scource or their genetic survival. Birds will devistate a bean or pea crop, so need to be controlled regardless. We are not alone as animals in feeling lost of those close, but a hunter is an equal not a superior.