It is unfortunately the world we live in now and like knife law I like to know when I am getting myself in trouble.I think to even hint that you could be sued for administering FA, even as a trained FAW, is totally counter productive.
Do you have any examples where a lay person, and I include those that hold a FAW, have been sued for administering FA to someone. Certainly not something I have heard of before.It is unfortunately the world we live in now and like knife law I like to know when I am getting myself in trouble.
Cattley vs St Johns Ambulance Brigade (1988) - This is the case that provides the legal definition for First Aid providers and negligence.Do you have any examples where a lay person, and I include those that hold a FAW, have been sued for administering FA to someone. Certainly not something I have heard of before.
The St John's case above I believe is the only successful one in the UK however I cannot find any stats on how many unsuccessful cases have been brought.I'm not aware of a successful case of it in the UK
it's possible someone may have tried to sue but it got dismissed.
or it may have happened in another country with a more litigious outlook.
or it may not have happened at all and the 'risk' is all made up...
Yes, SJA won the case however it is where the legal definition comes from for how a first aider will be judged in court.According to this report of the case
it was not successful and the SJA won the case.Error - Cookies Turned Off
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
It was not settled and no guilt was placed on either SJA or the first aider.
At least i think that's how it reads
No worries as I said finding this information is hard work.OK, i didn't read anything about the recording.
I cannot work this out at all because when using an automatic defib you do what the machine tells you.If anyone ignored the instructions for 7 mins they should be told off. First aider or not.
That is not the actions of the average person.
Apparently this case is the reason for that training as the money from the settlement went to that.Also, this was a while ago and defibs are much better now and far more people have experience/ training with them.
My stance is if you have the first aid at work qualification or equivalent qualification ie Wilderness First Aid then you should have insurance to protect yourself from legal action as it not about winning the case, it about paying for the lawyer.Not sure you can put too much store on this in today's environment.
I remember when the defibs first came out it was possible to shock without VF being recognised.I cannot work this out at all because when using an automatic defib you do what the machine tells you.
Insurance in general isn't a bad idea i think. of course it's up to the individual to decide on their own level of acceptable risk with regard to this kind of thing. where do you get insurance from?My stance is if you have the first aid at work qualification or equivalent qualification ie Wilderness First Aid then you should have insurance to protect yourself from legal action as it not about winning the case, it about paying for the lawyer.
Not sure that corporate manslaughter works in quite that way. as long as SJA train people correctly it has no power how it's pupils use - or don't use, the training.We also live in a slightly different world because we now have Corporate Manslaughter which may effect how these cases are dealt with in the future. If I was St Johns I would be terrified of that change in the law.