Woodlore is a brand.
Puukko is a style.
Hello folks!
I thought for many times to start this topic but today I thought of going to work.
More specifically, I'm interested in your opinions on Woodlore knives vs Puukko knives but also to argue the choice made.
Thank you in advance!
Yes, I mean “woodlore style”, bushcraft classic knifeTrue, but I suspect Lika meant 'Woodlore style' - of which there are many examples!
Good point of view, @gra_farmer!Depends on the use, Woodlore style knives are general arounders (apart from food prep) and are often 3mm or 4mm thick steel.
Puukko's fit a similar role to the Woodlore style, but often rat tail tang, so although can be tasked to similar work, there is often a tenancy to not be pushed as hard.
Now for me the grind and blade thickness is more important, for the tasks at hand. It is hard to beat a high scandi grind on thin blade stock for wood carving. While a shallower scandi grind that you get on the Enzo trappers is a great beating edge, that wedges wood apart.
As I go on this journey into what I personally prefer using, I am leaning more towards high sabre grinds and convex edge, and full tang.
@Tiley: I like your answer very much! I heard good things regarding Peltonen Sissipuukko but I also really liked the way Terrava Jaakaripuukko 110 behaved.My introduction to the tools of bushcraft involved the Woodlore-style knife, among others. Later on, I tried out the puuko style of cutting tool, with mixed success. They are more delicate and, as has been mentioned, better for finer work, such as finer carving and food preparation. The pentagon geometry of the blade is interesting and lends a different 'feel' and technique to cutting and carving; personally, I have found this a mixed blessing, working well on some puukos and less well on others.
By contrast, the Woodlore-style knife is a heavier-duty cutting tool which, for a broad range of bushcraft activities, works pretty well. That style certainly has a stronger, more robust 'feel' to it, which engenders a greater confidence in the tool's ability to perform a given task.
Ultimately, I think it depends (a) on what you are used to and (b) what you want your knife to do. Every cutting tool is a compromise of some sort, be it Woodlore-style or puuko; your happiness with the choice you make depends on your ability to accept the strengths and weaknesses of any particular design, any particular make. For me, I think I'd rate the Woodlore-style blade above the puuko but the Peltonen Sissipuuko is a very fine tool...
@Erbswurst, I have one, Opinel #7 in Carbon. I use it for almost daily tasks, like food, unpacking and various light daily tasks.Opinel No7 Carbone?
Certainly true of the stainless ones.I was always told that you haven't an 'ope-in-'ell of keeping it sharp...