The SUVs I looked at didn't seem to have any extra clearance than the base car. Could he wrong since the base car versions were buried right around the back of the car lot. Seems dealers are fanning the fad by promoting the fake SUVs.
Ford focus about 1300kg, NCAP 5 star safety rating.
Ford kuga about 1600kg, NCAP 5 star rating.
By my calculation 13 % higher weight but in NCAP ratings there is not much difference in safety if any. I wonder how much of an advantage 300kg is for safety? I doubt it's any safer. NCAP testing is rigorous, however I understood it's comparative in that two cars with the same rating generally has a similar level if safety. It's not just about crashing neither, pedestrian safety is factored in too I believe.
I also read on a newspaper a while back that 4x4s were popular because they're safer. Truth was some were, some were most definitely not. The news piece gave examples but I don't recall. I do think it's the same with SUVs. Perception is they're all safer but they're not in a lot of cases.
I don't know if those ratings include pedestrian safety or not, but that would certainly explain the similar ratings. Tghat said, I don't think most of us are considering pedestrian safety when we choose a vehicle.
Even without ratings or tests it's obvious that if a Semi (full sized lorry) collides with a Mini, the occupants of the Lorry are much safer than the occupants of the Mini. (I know that's an extreme comparison but the only thing that really changes if you scale it back is exactly that: scale (scale of size/mass difference and scale of relative safety) I imagine you're right though; 300 kilos probably isn't going to make a lot of difference.
Last edited: