No, Defender owners do those things because the vehicles are designed to be simple to be servised and fixed.
No special tools, no sensors that need dedicated computers.
Parts that are cheap and widely available.
That might have been true up to the demise of the Tdi engined Defenders in 1998 but the need to meet ever tightening emissions regs has meant that the TD5 (1999 - 2006) and Tdci ((2007 - 2016) engined Defenders had increasing amounts of electrickery managing their engines and brakes and require hooking up to diagnostic computers to service and maintain and won’t run on rough grade diesel. All the inherent flaws of a Defender plus the problems of electrickery goes wrong - IIRC a single injector for a TD5 costs more than a whole set for a Tdi.
I would happily head off to just about any point on the globe in my Tdi 110, but from what I have seen and read about the Transit engines in the Tdci Defenders, I would choose another marque.
Not my idea of fun. My idea of fun involves driving a car that's reliable and easily fixed by letting it reside at a local garage for a day in.exchange for money. While I'm out doing something enjoyable with my time.
I do find it funny how defender drivers love fixing their cars so much. Is it something you have in you before you buy your first defender or something you learn to love as a result of having to do it to keep your defender on the road without blowing shedloads of money at a garage?
Working on Defenders is just like working on 1960s British cars (I started with old Austins and Triumphs) only the bits are bigger and diesel stuff just works until in doesn’t when it’s usually necessary to get a grown-up to look at it!
They are very capable and practical vehicles if you accept their many flaws and limitations - lack of investment by a succession of owners meant that the styling remained the same for decades and eventually acquired iconic status which has lead to a cult following amongst those who like the idea of having a Defender as a lifestyle accessory rather than having a real need for one.
My 110 was my home for 3 years and served as a mobile workshop, generator, fire engine, paddy wagon, patrol vehicle etc. etc. in the bush and covered over 70,000 miles in Africa and the Middle East with only the odd issue (well quite a few!), none of which couldn’t be fixed by the roadside or when it got (under its own steam) to a workshop. I like to think that Maurice Wilks (designer of the original Land-Rover) would approve of the use I have made of his offspring (there were a handful of alternatives but I am happy with my choice), but back now in the UK, even though I now live in a rural and hilly part of Wales and occasionally drag an Ifor Williams trailer behind it, I cannot honestly say that I need a 110 or that it is the most suitable vehicle for my current needs.
Maybe those on this thread who keep recommending a Defender to you really do have a genuine need for a bulky, uncomfortable, slow vehicle albeit one with outstanding off-road and towing capabilities and make use of its potential but apart for the dwindling number being driven by the military, utility company employees, farmers, tree surgeons etc in the UK (Land Rover long ceased to be a serious competitor to Toyota in Africa and elsewhere in the third world), most people driving Defenders do so because they like the image, even if it is just to tow little Chlamydia’s pony to a gymkana twice a year.
I won’t sell mine (too many fond memories and the potential for future adventures), but I almost certainly wouldn’t buy one if I didn’t already have one.
The reality is that between 70 and 80% of all Defenders ever made are still on the road (apparently)
This is an urban myth (my Defender has bits from at least ten scrap vehicles on it so do the maths!), although Toyota Land Cruiser owners the world over like to quote it adding “... but the other X% made it home safely!”