Warning description added to fair game and question

[Tony]

I've changed the description slightly to add a warning to the fair game forum. I would like to see more content in this area and want people/you to feel comfortable posting it here. Obviously, it needs to be in keeping with bushcraft/homesteading and be appropriately presented.

That makes me consider changing the Fair Game forum to signed-in members only, any visitor can view most forums, but that's probably unwise considering this subject matter.
Any thoughts?

 

[Wildgoose]

I think given the upcoming changes to legislation around children accessing certain media it would be a good idea to restrict this area to members.

I personally have no issues with guns or game but a layperson might

 

[Pattree]

Yeah. It’s a good idea.

 

[crosslandkelly]

Sounds like a very sensible move.

 

[Chris]

Sounds reasonable. Unfortunately the reality is that people find it offensive, but not plastic trays full of meat that got raised in a cage and slaughtered en mass.

 

[Nice65]

I reckon this is 100% your call Tony. It was me who opened the suture thread on an iPhone Mini and saw a thigh, badly cut and bloody and complained the pic should have come with a warning or better, use Spoiler tags to hide the immediate impact. I actually had no idea I was looking at pig skin, or that it wasn’t a genuine wound to a human leg. As such, it wasn’t what I wanted or expected to look at eating breakfast.

Where meat comes from, especially game, perhaps ought not to be censored? Might be worth looking at a couple of the hunting and stalking forums to see what’s accessible to anyone without membership?

I like these:

Spoiler: Dodgy meme warning

 

[British Red]

I tend to only post occasionally in Fair Game Tone purely to not drag you into the pearl clutching outbursts of the squeamish. We hunt, pluck & skin, dress out & butcher wild meat & also raise livestock that we slaughter & butcher (we are even starting to stock home slaughter equipment). Do let us know where the boundary is & we will post more

 

[Pattree]

Limit the subject to members, leave tagging to the author and the forum title and you won’t need boundaries.

I have no objection to informative posts on hunting, culling or butchery but I can’t help thinking that from time to time a post can be deliberately provocative.

 

[TeeDee]

Limit the subject to members, leave tagging to the author and the forum title and you won’t need boundaries.

I have no objection to informative posts on hunting, culling or butchery but I can’t help thinking that from time to time a post can be deliberately provocative.

If someone finds something provocative isn't that more down to the person reading it?

How does one post something so another doesn't find it provocative? Genuine question - are you talking about the related words used or headline title - if so what words should be used to be neutral?

 

[Tengu]

Im unhappy with a world that had trigger warnings.

 

[Crac]

I would change the tone to read: "Contains: Animal trapping, butchery and cooking are discussed here. If you do not like seeing this content, please avoid this forum."