What, like this?
Si
Again. Remember that wasn't a whole aircraft flying into something under power; it was pieces falling to earth by gravity AFTER the plane broke up. A completely different scenario.
What, like this?
Si
But would the metal evaporate once vapourised?...
What, like this?
Si
See that turbine? The official line says that's a honeywell gas turbine from the tail section of the airliner. Honeywell later declared that's not one of ours and we certainly didn't fit that into a an airliner.
The ground was salted with wreckage. And those parts inside were investigated and found not to be from an airliner matching flight 77.
How odd
Again. Remember that wasn't a whole aircraft flying into something under power; it was pieces falling to earth by gravity AFTER the plane broke up. A completely different scenario.
... What made me question the official word was this bit of footage, then I dug a bit deeper. including the Van Allen belt, radiation shielding on the rockets and Lunar module and Command vehicle, Saturn 5 engines compared to the Space Shuttles etc. Make up your own mind
Pretty breezy for the vacuum of space and where are the stars? ...
Really? Investigated by whom? And why are they more reliable (or trustworthy) than the official invetigators?
That IS what "vaporized" means isn't it? Turned into "vapor?"
Heres the video of whatever hit the pentagon hitting the pentagon
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-14395484
Funny how it doesnt show a plane isn't it?
That half ton of `moon` rock could have been an asteroid that landed on earth - could you tell the differance between the two ???
Say what you like mate. thats the "official" security video released by the US gov.Yep. You'd think those damned CIA stooges would have faked their security camera footage better than that. Even my son could manage to get a better fake video together.
Say what you like mate. thats the "official" security video released by the US gov.
Pause it at 4 seconds in and you can just make out the nose of what ever did hit it. It wasn't flight 77, the nose of the plane is way more blunt than the nose poking in on the video. Which is much more narrow and streamlined.
Heres flight 77 for reference
View attachment 9846
Pause it at 4 seconds in and you can just make out the nose of what ever did hit it. It wasn't flight 77, the nose of the plane is way more blunt than the nose poking in on the video. Which is much more narrow and streamlined.
The funniest thing about all this is the belief in the virtual omnipotence of "them". "They" can do anything, keep hundreds of thousands of people and numerous states antithetical to their aims from "betraying" secrets, clean any site with total efficiency, etc etc etc. And at the lead of the van is the CIA.
This is the organisation that failed 30 times to kill Castro, by all accounts! And let nasty little secrets like rendition/Abu Graib leak out. Vietnam. Bay of Pigs - WMDs - Watergate - the list of cock-ups is fairly large. Yet the foil-hat brigade would have us believe they're seamlessly fronting up conspiracies the like of which make the previous "errors" pale into insignificance!
Some "omnipotence"! Quite frankly, if you believe that you'll believe anything..............
Far better to believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster................