Well Jon, we can disagree. I have no problem with the scale, given how long the legs are on these things. I see T. gigantea/saeva when I look at those pics, but of course there is no way to tell without seeing the actual specimen. They can mature at different sizes too.
As for markings, I don't recognise T. domestica as something brightly marked. Maybe it is different in the States. The pictures on
this site are much closer to my experience. The picture of T. domestica in that link is the same one as in Dick Jone's "A Guide to Spiders of Britain and Northern Europe" which, whilst out of print, is still the best photographic guide to UK spiders. On the other hand, Mike Roberts 3 volume set of books (the definitive taxonomic guide for UK species) does say that T. domestica is very variable in markings, sometimes bright like your pic, sometimes dull like mine
But I've never seen a well marked one, and all of the ones in my collection are uniform brown.
As for the taxonomy, Roberts does refer to T. duellica, but he sometimes uses names that are not accepted by the general arachnological community, and on the official checklists T. duellica is known as T. gigantea.
I've got great respect for your skills and knowledge, and you are invariably right when I see you post, and I certainly wouldn't argue with you about reptiles, but spiders are my thing. Sorry if I sound argumentative.