I have a mate who lost his legs and he'd be more p'd off if he thought he'd been singled out not to have his stuff nicked because of that....he'd take it as yet another able bodied person treating him differently
He merely stole food and supplies. It's no excuse but certainly understandable.
He merely stole food and supplies. It's no excuse but certainly understandable. Sadly, he gets to languish in jail while the financial services industry, who have stolen so much from so many of us, get to keep their spoils. Incarceration seems unfair. Therapy sounds more appropriate. I'd be more interested in understanding why he chose this lifestyle.
and with comments like that, that is exactly what is wrong with the Country (World?) today
He'd've done better raiding your crayfish traps and replacing them minus the haul, if your blogs anything to go by!....Not only is the fishing fantastic around here, but it's fun.
Say all you like with the moral high ground well and truly taken and a quick slip into Daily Mail headline type posts; but I have a funny feeling he did better than any of us could have done
Its was never about "bushcraft" its was about his own survival
We all know you couldn't really survive in the UK by foraging wild food and hunting so he would have had no chance in the enviroment he was in had he not pushed his foraging a bit further.
I agree he probably had some mental health issues in which case he should be cared for not imprisoned. That seems particularly cruel in this case
Just my view obviously not everyones
Perhaps you couldn't live by foraging in the UK. I don't know enough about it to intelligently comment. But in Maine (and other places over here) there are quite a few people who live by hunting, fishing, and trapping year round. Enough so that no one even gives them a second thought.
You're right; it wasn't about bushcraft. it was about living without having to work.
Done properly by people that know what they are doing hunting foraging fishing and gathering your own wood is should work out less work than working an 8 hour shift 5 days a week......
.....There are people that in Uk that can live mostly by foraging, or shoot most of their meat. There is/was a bloke that lived in woods near me for a few years. He hasnt been seen for bit so people dont know if he has moved on or died. He did steal some things, he shop lifted butter and lard, he took milk from door steps in winter and some clothes from washing lines. They were thefts of nesscity not lazyness, he mostly survived by eating wild game and weeds. He was ex army and probably had mental health issues.
Perhaps you couldn't live by foraging in the UK. I don't know enough about it to intelligently comment. But in Maine (and other places over here) there are quite a few people who live by hunting, fishing, and trapping year round. Enough so that no one even gives them a second thought.
You're right; it wasn't about bushcraft. it was about living without having to work.
And did no real harm at all
I think the last people to do that in reality in your neck of the woods and quite successfully were native Americans
We put a stop to that
I call you on how many people are living solely by those means in reality i.e trapping and foraging with no purchase, unlawful appropriation or trade involved
I don't want to get into a big debate about it but because it moves into the nether regions of bushcraft Vs survival Which has been beaten to death
Quite a few people that I know of. Not without purchase true enough; you have to buy the traps, the guns, the ammo, the fishing tackle, the archery equipment, and the appropriate licenses. Nothing illegal at all though. You buy those things (an investment of about $3000 initially for equipment and licenses the first year and another $ 300-$400 per year thereafter) and sell the furs for about $$35,00 per year if doing it full time and treating it as your only job. I helped a cousin run his part time trapline one season and he made a good chunk of change doing it as a hobby. All perfectly legal. In Alaska the investment is a bit more perhaps but then so is the rreturn.
Without the trapping aspect (and thus no monetary return) I still know personally of a few dozen people who subsist entirely on hunted deer and trot-lined catfish; again, all perfectly legally.
You're partly right in that it's not "bushcraft." But then it's not "survival" either. It's simply the way they're way of life. And there's no debate involved; it's fact.
Also seems a bit interesting that when you speak of "my neck of the woods" (the eastern side of the country, particularly the Southeast) you seem to believe that the pre-Columbian Native Americans here were primarily hunter/gatherers. They weren't. They were primarily farmers with established trading routes extending 100s of miles.