tomtom said:
dont some people ware bright orange camo when hunting?
They do indeed Tomtom....in fact in certain US states it's a legal requirement. Has nothing to do with stalking though....it's because some of the hunters over there have taken to making iffy shots at anything that moves, only to then find out afterwards it was another hunter. To be fair in failing light it's hard to spot a cammed up person crawling through the bushes and the rule should always be that you are 100% sure of what you are shooting before you pull the trigger....in practice this doesn't always happen.
A similar thing happened over here last year where a group out lamping for foxes where if not cammed up then certainly subdued in their dress. One of the chaps saw movement and the flash of eye and let a round off at it....it turned out to be a 14 year old boy.
I have a ghilli suit I made while in the TA, it's great for crawling around and not being seen but like Bill says below I'm not convinced of the bennefit of cammo while hunting, stalking or observing nature. The Ghilli suit was invented by Scotish Ghilli's (gamekeepers) to use while stalking but not while stalking animals, the gamekeeper's used it to stalk poachers in much the same way that military snipers use them to stalk human targets.
We (humans) see in colour and so cammo is important, most animals see in black and white (or shades thereof) and so unless you happen to have Neon type clothing (and I'm not sure even this would matter) you can more or less where what you like. The important factors are movement, noise and shadow, shape and sillouett for animals.
The old saying about a red rag to a bull highlights this. It has now been proved that Bulls are colour blind and that it's not the red they don't like, it's the movement of the rag.
Anyway...I'm heading further and further off topic so I'll stop here....
Hope that's of interest to some