i think the argument has been a little skewed so far.
there are axes and axes. most of the folks posting so far have rightly pointed out the excellence of the gransfors stuff. they're really very good, at a price.
many of the cheaper axes really really need a lot of work to set them up so they are safe to use, most have very uneven edges that can produce very dangerous glancing. i've seen a guy with a hatchet come very close to landing it in his own head as it glanced and bounced off the wood he was chopping.
there are also machetes and machetes. you can get very long thin machetes, suitable really only for cutting grasses. you can get much shorter machetes that are a bit thicker, the old brit army golok is a reasonable example. the shorter thicker machete is a very useable all rounder. as just demonstrated a short sturdy machete is a very versatile tool.
the traditional bilhook shares many of the advantages of the short stout machete. but with better edge holding than most softer machetes. it's a whole 'nother debate as to wether the traditional shape of the billhook, designed largely for cutting near the ground makes a more specialist tool and loosing some of the versatility of the machete. but who really uses the pointy end of a machete?
so yes, an axe of the same weight as your machete will usually out chop your machete, this applies more as the tools get bigger. i sold my gb mini as it had no advantage at all over other tools i owned. but don't be seduced by the power argument alone, if you really need more power, just buy a bigger axe or a bigger machete. but remember that bigger tools have to be paid for with the effort on the hike.
so, dispassionate arguments aside, what would i recommend of the two? the answer is neither. a good medium/small knife and a small saw. they are always useful. see if you can get to a members meet and have a play with their toys before you splash out. failing that, get a short stout machete or a billhook!
cheers, and.
there are axes and axes. most of the folks posting so far have rightly pointed out the excellence of the gransfors stuff. they're really very good, at a price.
many of the cheaper axes really really need a lot of work to set them up so they are safe to use, most have very uneven edges that can produce very dangerous glancing. i've seen a guy with a hatchet come very close to landing it in his own head as it glanced and bounced off the wood he was chopping.
there are also machetes and machetes. you can get very long thin machetes, suitable really only for cutting grasses. you can get much shorter machetes that are a bit thicker, the old brit army golok is a reasonable example. the shorter thicker machete is a very useable all rounder. as just demonstrated a short sturdy machete is a very versatile tool.
the traditional bilhook shares many of the advantages of the short stout machete. but with better edge holding than most softer machetes. it's a whole 'nother debate as to wether the traditional shape of the billhook, designed largely for cutting near the ground makes a more specialist tool and loosing some of the versatility of the machete. but who really uses the pointy end of a machete?
so yes, an axe of the same weight as your machete will usually out chop your machete, this applies more as the tools get bigger. i sold my gb mini as it had no advantage at all over other tools i owned. but don't be seduced by the power argument alone, if you really need more power, just buy a bigger axe or a bigger machete. but remember that bigger tools have to be paid for with the effort on the hike.
so, dispassionate arguments aside, what would i recommend of the two? the answer is neither. a good medium/small knife and a small saw. they are always useful. see if you can get to a members meet and have a play with their toys before you splash out. failing that, get a short stout machete or a billhook!
cheers, and.