Husqvarna Traditional (Multi-Purpose) Axe Review

  • Hey Guest, Early bird pricing on the Summer Moot (29th July - 10th August) available until April 6th, we'd love you to come. PLEASE CLICK HERE to early bird price and get more information.

rg598

Native
As I promised on my blog, now that I have a Gransfors Bruks Scandinavian Forest Axe, to which to compare, I’ll try to put out some mid size axe reviews. The first axe on the list is the Husqvarna Traditional (Multi-Purpose) Axe.

036.JPG


Specifications:
Manufacturer: Husqvarna
Axe Head Weight: Advertised as 1.87 lb (measured as 2.55 lb)
Axe Length: Advertised as 26 inches (measured as 25 inches)
Axe Head Material: Unknown Swedish steel
Handle Material: American hickory
Cost: $64.00

b%20%2812%29.JPG


There is a lot of confusion surrounding this axe, and that is why I made it my first mid size axe review. The confusion is a direct result of the information provided by the manufacturer.

This axe is part of the new series of axes produced by Husqvarna. Its model number is 502 64 00-01. It is advertised by Husqvarna and several distributors as having a head weight of 1.87 lb. You will find the same axe however at other distributers being advertised as having a head weight of 3 lb. The reason for the discrepancy is the fact that the axe head in no way weighs 1.87 lb. I have no idea where Husqvarna got that number, but the axe is clearly heavier.

I have calculated its head weight to be 2.55 lb (2 lb 9 oz). The way I calculated that is by measuring the weight of the Gransfors Bruks Scandinavian Forest Axe. Knowing that the head of the Scandinavian Forest Axe weighs 2 lb, I calculated the weight of the handle to be 10 oz. Since the handles of the Gransfors Bruks Scandinavian Forest Axe and the Husqvarna Traditional (Multi-Purpose) Axe are almost identical, I assumed that they both weigh 10 oz. Subtracting the weight of the handle from the overall weight of the Husqvarna Axe, I calculated the weight of the head. This is not an ideal method, and there can be an error of an ounce or two, but the weight of the head is around 2.5 lb.

This is also clear to see when the two axes are compared. Here you can see the Gransfors Bruks Scandinavian Forest Axe next to the Husqvarna Traditional (Multi-Purpose) Axe.

046.JPG

b%20%284%29.JPG


The head of the Husqvarna Axe is clearly much thicker than that of the Gransfors Bruks. Interestingly, even though the head is thicker, Husqvarna has managed to give it a very thin cutting edge, comparable to that of the Gransfors Bruks. The head becomes thicker in a gradual and continuous way, while keeping the eye the same size as on the Gransfors Bruks Scandinavian Forest Axe. This gives excellent chopping as well as splitting characteristics to the head. The attachment method to the handle is a wooden wedge with a round pin. In all other respects, the heads of the two axes are nearly identical.

053.JPG


The balance of the axe, an important consideration when if comes to large axes, is fairly good. The bit is somewhat heavier than the poll, so you can see it dipping down more than it does on the Gransfors Bruks Scandinavian Forest Axe, but it is still fairly well balanced. The head and the handle are perfectly balanced.

a%20%2811%29.JPG


The handles of the two axes are the same length, 25 inches. The grain orientation is very good, and the handle has a great feel to it. It is nearly identical to that of the Gransfors Bruks.

057.JPG


The testing of the axes revealed the Husqvarna to be an exceptional tool. The fact that Husqvarna has managed to add another half a pound to the axe head without making the cutting edge and grind any thicker than it is on the Grnsfors Bruks Scandinavian Forest Axe, makes for a great chopper. As you can see in the picture, the Husqvarna Traditional (Multi-Purpose) Axe outperformed the Gransfors Bruks Scandinavian Forest Axe. That is clearly a result of the extra half pound. Here you can see the results after 25 swings with each axe.

v%20%283%29.JPG


The Husqvarna Traditional (Multi-Purpose) Axe also makes for a good splitter because of the thicker head. That being said, with axes this size, 99% of all splitting tasks that you are likely to do in the bush will be accomplished well by either axe. The difference shows when it comes to thick logs, which you will rarely have to process in the bush.

Carving is possible, and the axe bites into the wood well at shallow angles, but the long handle combined with the heavy head, makes it less than ideal for the task.

The sheath on the axe is of good quality, but clearly not specifically designed for this axe. It seems to be too large, and is hard to get tight. It appears to be an old model Wetterlings sheath, lending fuel to the speculation that the heads are being manufactured by Wetterlings. Another connection may be the fact that the bottom part of the eye has some bunching up of the metal, characteristic of the Wetterlings axes. This of course is just speculation.

The Husqvarna Traditional (Multi-Purpose) Axe is a great tool. In terms of quality, it is indistinguishable from any Gransfors Bruks axe. For $64 it is a bargain. It is also however, at the very limit of what I would consider carrying on my back for an extended period of time. The 2.5 lb head makes for a heavy axe.

As far as I know, the manufacturer produces additional bushcraft appropriate axes: The Husqvarna Hatchet (1.25lb head; 13 inches in length).
 

British Red

M.A.B (Mad About Bushcraft)
Dec 30, 2005
26,715
1,962
Mercia
Good review - how was the grind on the cutting edge? Wetterlings have been a bit sloppy lately with some clear forging indentations toward the cutting edge.
 

seraphim

Member
Dec 19, 2010
46
0
Ratae Corieltauvorum
Ross,

Thanks, just ordered myself a Huskie Hatchet and All Round Axe (The name of the Traditional 68cm model axe in the UK) based on this review, as the big one can stay at home mostly for the wood burner and the little one can come out camping with me and used for kindling!

Managed to pass it by the Better half as we have a multi-fuel stove and an axe is a must dontcherknow!

Husky now apparently do a 'small axe' (check out their uk website) but there are zero details about it on line, it'd be interesting to see if it was roughly the size of an SFA wouldn't it!!
 

seraphim

Member
Dec 19, 2010
46
0
Ratae Corieltauvorum
Received a text message from Husqvarna!

'Unfortunately, the small axe is for South Africa only. The closest equivalent is the Carpenter Axe 504 69 45-09, length 50cm weight 1kg'


Those dimensions sound familiar! Depends on the blade of the carpenter vs a general purpose axe I guess!
 

littlebiglane

Native
May 30, 2007
1,651
1
52
Nr Dartmoor, Devon
I have got one of these All Purpose axes and impressions are good. No, the fit and finish is not as good as GB but its about 89% there. It splits better than the ScFA so wins out all round in my book. Especially at the discount (when compared to the ScFA) I got it at.
 

littlebiglane

Native
May 30, 2007
1,651
1
52
Nr Dartmoor, Devon
Received a text message from Husqvarna!

'Unfortunately, the small axe is for South Africa only. The closest equivalent is the Carpenter Axe 504 69 45-09, length 50cm weight 1kg'

Those dimensions sound familiar! Depends on the blade of the carpenter vs a general purpose axe I guess!

Carpenter axe has a straight/flat cutting edge
 

BCUK Shop

We have a a number of knives, T-Shirts and other items for sale.

SHOP HERE