Cotton is just about the least sustainable fiber there is. Look at Lake Aral.natural fabrics when possible
Cotton is just about the least sustainable fiber there is. Look at Lake Aral.natural fabrics when possible
Indigenous peoples have shown us the right way, that life on this planet can be sustainable, they don't over fish or over hunt areas because they know the consequences of losing those natural resources. The modern consumer society doesn't seem to have learnt that lesson.
Another way to look at it is that rather than “impacting” the environment, we are “part of” the environment. After all we did evolve in it and our footprint is only part of the evolution of the environment itself.
My point being, there are not enough twigs on the floor for 66 million people to burn them; so we all have to make sure that when we do we are not taking it for granted that we can.
The more I see...the more insular I am becoming.
My point being, there are not enough twigs on the floor for 66 million people to burn them; so we all have to make sure that when we do we are not taking it for granted that we can.
Quite, it is somewhat doubtful if the British Isles could support all those people as hunter gatherers.It's a nice thought but no 'indigenous' peoples have had to share 250,000 square km with 66 million other people.
I am also not so sure that "indigenous" people think always of there surroundings, in most cases they just did not have the means to destructive activity (as we do). It is still being debated how much humans were part of the disappearance of the mega fauna some tens of thousands of years ago. When let go free most humans are not very good at taking care of their surroundings. It takes some thought (not all that common) and some practise.
I have a recollection of a study of hunter gatherers where the result was that most of them are not living at the edge of existence. Depends of course of a lot of things. On ocean shore the sea offers a continuous source of food. On the northern part of Am. west coast it was shown how important the sea was for survival when deer were hiding and salmon runs late.I would imagine they were too busy trying to survive to consider if their homeland would become a SSSI in 10K years
Really, I'd be keen to read that study, I've mostly found papers that suggested H/G's
had a roughly 50/50 chance they would reached puberty and even then only had another 15-20 years to live
I would expect a lot of fighting over a constant food source added to the issue
Recent evidence suggests that Hunter Gatherers (Mesolithic) had a longer life expectancy than the early farmers (Late Neolithic) - the reduction in food choice etc. is thought to be the reason.
Do you have any papers? - I've tried to look but its not my field, my access to academia is limited to medical publications.