Thanks for the update. A quick look through seems they are going to ignore many of the responses and go ahead regardless. The number people who responded seems a bit low and it's frustrating that they claim people didn't understand their questions when they didn't get the answers they wanted.The Government has now published it’s response to the consultation:
Machetes and other bladed articles: proposed legislation
Consultation on new knife legislation proposals to tackle the use of machetes and other bladed articles in crime.www.gov.uk
As with many/most "consultations" of this nature the questions were designed to lead.Thanks for the update. A quick look through seems they are going to ignore many of the responses and go ahead regardless. The number people who responded seems a bit low and it's frustrating that they claim people didn't understand their questions when they didn't get the answers they wanted.
Most of that seems sensible to be fair. I'm glad it clarified which types of large knives and machetes it seeks to ban, and which it deems suitable for legitimate use.The Government has now published it’s response to the consultation:
Machetes and other bladed articles: proposed legislation
Consultation on new knife legislation proposals to tackle the use of machetes and other bladed articles in crime.www.gov.uk
Illegal to import, buy, sell or possess.What does “Banned” mean in this instance?
I make knives for a living mate, so it's pretty relevant to myself also. Understandable to be worried about some things, but i do generally find our government pretty sensible when it comes to knife law.You may feel differently if sitting on several thousand pounds worth of world tribal and military blades, many if not most of of which were specifically designed as weapons but which you've managed not to cause harm to any human being with for fifty and some years.
There we shall have to disagree.I make knives for a living mate, so it's pretty relevant to myself also. Understandable to be worried about some things, but i do generally find our government pretty sensible when it comes to knife law.
You may feel differently if sitting on several thousand pounds worth of world tribal and military blades, many if not most of of which were specifically designed as weapons but which you've managed not to cause harm to any human being with for fifty and some years.
Criminals will carry anything they can get their hands on. Part of the proposed legislation regards a proposal to introduce a charge with a heavier sentence. Carrying a knife with intent to cause harm or fear of violence. Currently, we just have carrying an offensive weapon in a public place.The thing is it's still just proposals, the draft and final law could be very different; perhaps less restrictive, perhaps more.
One thing that puzzles me a bit, most knife crime uses kitchen knives but there doesn't seem anything in the proposals to tackle this - have I missed something or will criminals just switch to buying/steeling something else to stab someone with?
There is no conclusion drawn on historic blades. In any case, is a Kris or Khukuri manufactured today "historic"?There is plenty of room for collectors of historic blades.
There was similar concern with the ban on long curved blades, samurai swords etc, a few years ago. Basically worked out as modern blades were ok, so long as they were made in a traditional way or something like that.There is no conclusion drawn on historic blades. In any case, is a Kris or Khukuri manufactured today "historic"?