Why the obsession that MC and the FC are the same?
Obsession? Erm... an idea or thought that continually preoccupies or intrudes on a person's mind... I'd hardly call one mention of the 2 documents being connected an obsession. By the definition of obsession though, I am obsessed with the idea of looking up the actual facts.
The Forest Charter was written in 1217, 2 years after the Magna Carta as a companion document to the Magna Carta, redressing some applications of the Anglo-Norman Forest Law that had been extended and abused by William Rufus, the charter re-established rights of access to the royal forest for free men that had been eroded by the Conqueror and his heirs.
As I said, like a codicil to a last will and testament. The final will and testament is a legal document in its own right, but the codicil is a companion document that can be added to the will in order to clarify, alter or add points not mentioned in the original will. A codicil can, in effect, change the meaning inside a will, without making the will an irrelevant document. Just needs both documents in solemn form.
So... obsessed with the documents MC and FC themselves or their relation to each other? Nope. Obsessed with the indisputable facts of the matter? Nah... I'm busy packing the last bit of my kit so I can wander into the woods tomorrow and exercise my rights under the Forest Charter by running through the woods with a piece of bacon on a string!
But to be clear and concise... you're wrong.
Ta Daaaaaa