Personally I've always fancied a crossbow, without having a good reason, but its academic as I don't have the spare cash.
To be honest i can't disagree with that completely as i've never shot an animal with anything other than a rifle, however, i can say that yes, rabbits and squirrels need a headshot for a quick, clean kill, by that i mean they will drop as the shot hits, not run around and then die slowly, i believe anyone shooting an animal for whatever reason is obliged to ensure the animal is killed as quickly and cleanly as possible...
A bit off the topic of "hunting" with a crossbow I still want to comment on your above post. While I agree with you sentiment for anyone "hunting" an animal, I cain't agree with your statement, "...anyone shooting an animal for WHATEVER reason has an obligation to ensure the animal is killed as quickly and cleanly as possible..." If you or family are being attacked by a dangerous animal (an unlikely event in the UK granted) all obligations beyond survival/protecting your family are void.
What are the safety implications when using a crossbow? If the string breaks can it whip you across the face/neck or does it all go forwards if it breaks?
...The main problem in my opinion is that the criteria for owning a crossbow is that you only have to be legally 18 to buy one. There isn't any real regulation to the ownership of them and they are an item when which used incorrectly can cause serious harm of even death...
BTW, was only a couple of years ago when a local fruitcake spiked a few hookers with a crossbow before slicing and dicing and eating them.
Would there really be an effective way to regulate it? After all it's just wood and string; any competent handyman could probably make one himself in the basement. At least by the second attempt. I had a friend make one back in the late 1970s. Figuring out the trigger was his biggest hurdle but even that only kept the project at a little more than a week IIRC.
When I say regulation I refer to something similar to what has been done with the legal purchase of sub 12ft/lb air rifles in that, the crossbow could only be purchased from approved outlets (subject to police control) who then have to check photo I.D to prove the buyer is 18 or older and take a copy for their records of sale should any incidents in a specific area arise.
At that point should an incident happen the police then have access to records of legal buyers within said area.
Again this wouldnt stop someone being an idiot with one but helps towards putting off those who have to follow the due process.
Just my opinion as you can buy a crossbow over the internet without any proof of age etc.
I understand what you're saying. But what I meant is that while you can regulate airguns successfully because most people have little choice but to buy one if they want it, a crossbow is a fairly simple do-it-yourself project. All that said, I still have dificulty understanding the whole concept of needing a license to buy an airgun (or a real gun for that matter)
I understand what you're saying. But what I meant is that while you can regulate airguns successfully because most people have little choice but to buy one if they want it, a crossbow is a fairly simple do-it-yourself project. All that said, I still have dificulty understanding the whole concept of needing a license to buy an airgun (or a real gun for that matter)
When I lived in Western Australia I did a great deal of hunting of rabbits, crows and the declared vermin species of cockatoos.this is untrue i believe, air rifles need a head shot on a rabbit or a squirrel to kill them, whereas bows have a much wider killzone. you hit a squirrel or a rabbit in the head/chest/neck/ ribcage area with a metal blunt with a 40lb bow and it will die almost instantly from hydraulic shock of something hitting it so hard. of course, the range is limited to about 20 yards with a good shot, whereas airgun ranges are up to 40yards with a less powerful but make up for it with much more accuracy.
When I lived in Western Australia I did a great deal of hunting of rabbits, crows and the declared vermin species of cockatoos.
I used blunts exclusively.
What you are saying is completely untrue. For starters, there is no 'hydraulic shock' from an arrow going sub-200fps. No way.
If you hit major bones, the bones tend to be shoved through the animal by the arrow, causing a huge amount of damage. They still don't "drop dead instantly".
Hit the abdomen, and they will live for minutes unless you shoot them again, hit them over the head or something.
Even shot through the lungs and ribs with an 11/32" blunt, a crow will live for 20-30s. That's a long time to be in agony.
Your statement about range isn't true, unless you are trying to ensure a headshot. Even then I'd say not many people can ensure a headshot on a small animal with a bow (not unless they are using a laser rangefinder on flat ground, sights and the animal is obliging enough to not move for the time it takes to set up the shot).
If not going for headshots, the practical limit is as far as the bow can shoot. I've killed crows out past 100yards - just a lucky shot - the arrow hits nearly as hard at 100yards as it does at 20.