Banning would probably be extreme (even it were realistically possible) Heavy fines for people who let their cats wander loose might be realistic.
We have an almost unbelievable problem here with feral cats. Is that common there as well?
So once they change the rules, and issue the new permits, the farmers can feast on delicious Pigeon!
Is there any stats on loss of produce due to Pigeons?
OK, let's be clear on a few things first:
1) Chris Packham is far from a "dreamy armchair environmentalists"; whether you agree with him or not he is a very experienced and knowledgeable naturalist. He understands the science and the politics of the situation.
2) All they have done is point out that farmers, gamekeepers and landowners have been breaking the law using the general license in the way they have so either the law must be changed, the killing stops, or the perpetrators are prosecuted - NE have decided to stop issuing licenses until it can be sorted.
There's always a third truth that will fall between these two extremes. We would probably all agree that pest levels of wildlife need to be controlled (even vegetarians will have to concede that it will protect the supply of vegetables) but if there is no policing or control on who does the killing, how the killing is done, and to what level (as is/was the current/yesterday's position) wildlife doesn't stand a chance. To put it into perspective (and I joke not) the farmers around here couldn't tell you the difference between a raven a crow and a rook - should they be doing the killing?
If that is so high, then an air rifle is silent......
Even if all pests are removed, and the farmer will harvest 100% of the potential amount, he/she will still make the same money.
why?
Supply and demand.
Larger production - prices will drop.
I do not understand why birds of prey are shot.
The eagles in southern Sweden got extinct because the farmers' Old Wifes said that eagles take newborn lamb, and peck out the eyes of newborn calves. And could take little Sven from the pram.
So the men shot them, usually by finding the nests and perforating the eggs and mama from below with shot.
Then the other ones
As a child, me and dad used to drive long distances to see hawks and such. I am talking a couple of hundred kilometers.
Doubt it will make much difference to that gamekeeper from Leadhills poisening bait to kill birds of prey then getting an utter joke of a slap on the wrist when he was caught.
Can't remember his name now but I'd be willing to put a fiver on his boss being in on it too.
A quick Google throws his name up and as I believe in things like that following a chap about his name is Lewis Whitham.
He was convicted so theres no doubt about it, just in case sombody whines about me putting it up.
When that happened to my friend in Sweden, he ate the lamb. Or calf.
The mother should protect it, so has the mother protecting instinct been bred away?
Was the lamb healthy?
( just pushing ideas around)
Not funny.
Yes, I like to call a spade a spade. Not English, am I? No sense of decorum etc...
Healthy before the attack of course.
My friend told me weak lamb and calves were often attacked, that sometimes the mother even abandoned them, so foxes and other animals took them.
If he saw a repeated problem with a female (mother) , he slaughtered her.
Had I lived closer to you, you would get orders for me.
Hoggett.. The best meat.
Impossible to get these days. I would even buy that older eve from you.....
(That is what comes with age, the straight talking, and taste for REAL meat!
That is how I met my longtime friends, the farmers. My chase for good food.. )
My choice is venison, Chinese water deer, abundant, easy to shoot and simply the best deer to eat.
!
There's always a third truth that will fall between these two extremes. We would probably all agree that pest levels of wildlife need to be controlled (even vegetarians will have to concede that it will protect the supply of vegetables) but if there is no policing or control on who does the killing, how the killing is done, and to what level (as is/was the current/yesterday's position) wildlife doesn't stand a chance. To put it into perspective (and I joke not) the farmers around here couldn't tell you the difference between a raven a crow and a rook - should they be doing the killing?