Bushcrafting with a katana

  • Come along to the amazing Summer Moot (21st July - 2nd August), a festival of bushcrafting and camping in a beautiful woodland PLEASE CLICK HERE for more information.
True - the only legal restrictions concerning Katana's cover the purchase / importation / manufacture NOT use or carry- They are subject to the same laws as fixed blade knives.

As of 6th April 2008 the The Criminal Justice Act 1988 (Offensive Weapons)(Amendment) Order 2008 came into force and Katanas are now classed as offensive weapons. So no they are not subject to the same laws as fixed blades, but to the same laws as flick knives, push daggers, knuckle dusters etc.

The only exemptions are for permitted activities such as historical re-enactment or sporting activities and 3rd party insurance must be in cover for the event. Bushcraft unfortunately isn't a permitted activity. Historical or traditional blades from Japan are exempt, but bearing in mind the costs of these exquisite blades even I wouldn't have one as "a user".

http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/conten...469672&ActiveTextDocId=3469672&filesize=17370
 
I knwo it would obviously not be honourable, but I should imagine it has been done in an extreme situation. That is what I am trying to research.

As of the change to the lethal weapons act in 2004, a katana that is used for martial arts in the UK, along with any other tools (such as Nunchucku) must be registered IF IT IS NOT USED FOR DECORATIONAL PURPOSES must be registered as a lethal weapon with your local police station.
 
I knwo it would obviously not be honourable, but I should imagine it has been done in an extreme situation. That is what I am trying to research.

As of the change to the lethal weapons act in 2004, a katana that is used for martial arts in the UK, along with any other tools (such as Nunchucku) must be registered IF IT IS NOT USED FOR DECORATIONAL PURPOSES must be registered as a lethal weapon with your local police station.

Can you show any documentary evidence for this?
 
Hello to you all who are lost in the annuals of laaaaaaaaaw!!!! just before I stop checking this thread for info, are we now just in a discussion with reguards the lagalitys of ownership.
 
I think the Shugendo would have had an axe.

(they had swords too, of course, but not for bushcrafting)

You try getting the sword off of one of my To Ken friends
 
I have a katana and also a daishō (matching katana and wakizashi pair) and I can tell you with certainty, they would be rubbish. You could hack through stuff, because it's a bit of sharp steel, but the design is totally wrong and you would damage the sword very quickly. The task is much better suited to any number of much cheaper/better tools.

To answer the question posed by our friend with the 1337 h4x0R handle, sword makers in Japan often only made a few dozen swords in a lifetime, usually at a rate of about 4 or 5 a year. Imagine how much they cost? There are documented records of at least one occasion of a Samurai selling his family home in order to purchase a sword from a master maker. They were designed for one purpose, to cut flesh, that is it. If you had spent £150,000 on a kitchen knife, would you start chopping logs with it? A Samurai would have chewed through a log with his teeth before he would have used his sword. I hope that helps with your "research". :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
I'm with Martyn on this one.
I too own a Daisho, and I can say with some certainty that it would fail utterly as a "bushcrafting" tool
Look at all the chopping tools used by indigenous people around the world.
How many of them resemble a Katana?
None.
There is a good reason for this.
Function defines form.

They are designed for drawing cuts against soft targets (flesh)

That is what they're good at.
 
Well I suppose it's because the wood is more solid. As others have posted above, the katana is not designed for slicing through timber and I don't know anyone who has tried it (they would be mad if they did :) ). However, I have seen bamboo being used in cutting demonstrations, although even that kind of cutting can easily damage the blade, especially in the hands of a novice. These days I believe the folks that do Iaido practice their cuts on compressed/rolled straw, which is kinder to the blade and probably more resembles the consistency of a human body.
 
Test cutting (or tameshigiri) is done with green bamboo, and wet tatami mats.
Green bamboo is (cutting wise) a completely different substance compared to the stuff you'll find in the garden center.
 
Wasn't planning on it, just wated some more info. In england you have to register Katanas as leathal weaopns with the local police station as of 2004. You then have to sign more paper than is in the bible to promise never to use it for harmful purposes or to remove it from you dwelling without good reason (breath).

no you dont!

after 10th April last year it was illegal to sell curved baldes over 50cm in length- yes katanas were targeted, but it was mainly aimed at the BS stainelss wall handgers doing the rounds on market stalls.

I can keep mine fine along with my MA insurance cert, but when they go to an iaido class they have to be kept in 2 sword bags, one over the other.

you can still buy swords pre-ww2 and post ww2 with certification ( mega bucks for a real tamahagane steel blade)
 
i don't think any samurai would have done anything like bushcraft to be honest they won't have cooked for themselves if they could help it never mind chop wood and make spoons. they were warriors and that was it they didn't do anything else they trained for combat
 
As of 6th April 2008 the The Criminal Justice Act 1988 (Offensive Weapons)(Amendment) Order 2008 came into force and Katanas are now classed as offensive weapons. So no they are not subject to the same laws as fixed blades, but to the same laws as flick knives, push daggers, knuckle dusters etc.

The only exemptions are for permitted activities such as historical re-enactment or sporting activities and 3rd party insurance must be in cover for the event. Bushcraft unfortunately isn't a permitted activity. Historical or traditional blades from Japan are exempt, but bearing in mind the costs of these exquisite blades even I wouldn't have one as "a user".

http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?LegType=All+Legislation&title=The+Criminal+Justice+Act+1988+(Offensive+Weapons)(Amendment)+Order&Year=2008&searchEnacted=0&extentMatchOnly=0&confersPower=0&blanketAmendment=0&sortAlpha=0&TYPE=QS&PageNumber=1&NavFrom=0&parentActiveTextDocId=3469672&ActiveTextDocId=3469672&filesize=17370

You've got it mixed up there - both the 1st and 2nd amendments of the 1988 act covered the purchase, import and manufacture of curved bladed swords but it did NOT add them to the Offensive Weapons Order which is a list of prohibited items which includes flick knives, balisongs, push daggers, disguised knives etc.

You can legally purchase, own and use a curved blade sword without the need for any kind of registration of ownership so long as the sword is pre-1954 or hand made. You can still buy a cheaper sword so long as it is for use in re-enactment / religious purposes / theatre or film use etc.
 

BCUK Shop

We have a a number of knives, T-Shirts and other items for sale.

SHOP HERE