Bear & Obama!!!!
- Thread starter knifefan
- Start date
With the right 3D printer, a GGTBod doll could be yours!
Definite accessories... walking poles and a portable firepit... possible accessories.... inflatable canoe and a bag of dehydrated venison
walking poles, jerky, woodgas stove, mora knife and a mark hill knife, laplander folding saw, tarp and bivvi and obviously real merino wool base layer clothing, and with the deluxe version of the doll you could get all of the above plus the kayak and gopro action camera, give it a couple of years more though and i reckon my action figure might come with a zimmerframe and colostomy bag
3d printer would be no good Dewi i don't want a real model of my own svelte figure, sod that, maybe they swap my head (with a scowl on my face that could skin a lion like they done with the bear doll) onto a GI Joe or Stretch Armstrong summick 
3d printer would be no good Dewi i don't want a real model of my own svelte figure, sod that, maybe they swap my head (with a scowl on my face that could skin a lion like they done with the bear doll) onto a GI Joe or Stretch Armstrong summick
The GI Joe with the moving eyes?
I reckon the best doll to use would be the Six Million Dollar man doll from the late seventies... that had the ratcheting arm and the magnifying eye... stick a big bushy beard and a woolen shirt on him... we're good to go!
My doll is even easier... grab a Tellytubby TinkyWinky doll... shove a scowly face on it and accessorise with a calculator and a walking stick... job done.
Your Honour... I was walking in a northerly direction when approached by the accused. He proposed the possibility of a doll based on himself. During the conversation of said doll, I realised I'd been drawn into a nefarious plot to create an idol of worship to the accused and before I could continue on my walk, a passerby, one MikeLA happened upon the discussion. I deny all involvement with the aforementioned venture and I move to have my testimony stricken from the record. Under article 38 of the constitution of Turkey, ex post facto punishment is prohibited. Irrelevant to this case, I know, but I mention it to distract from my obvious involvement. In conclusion your Honour, the accused is guilty and should be restricted from testifying further as this could prove devastating to my case. In summary, article 57 of Russia's constitution agrees with article 38 of the constitution of Turkey. This agreement should cast doubt on the accused.
Your Honour, given the accused testimony, could I draw your attention to article 97 of the Norwegian constitution, article 4 of the Law on General Provisions in the Netherlands and more to the point, clause 3 of article 1, section 9 of the United States constitution. All are in agreement with the aforementioned Russian constitution and indeed, the Turkish constitution as well. This points towards the fact that I have given you now five facts. These facts can not be disputed, I have ensured this by justifying these facts in your presence, so I see no other option than to see the accused as guilty, ignoring the accused's defence of insanity as the accused has not cited any of the constitutions I have cited. That fact alone should be sufficient to convict on the grounds of ignorance of the law, which is no defence at all. Furthermore, the accused shows no remorse, nothing that indicates that the accused will not derail another thread in the near or distant future. Coupled with the accused being ignorant of the constitutions I have mentioned, this is surely a case where the accused should be found guilty and punished within the accordance of the law that you determine fit to punish the accused under.