But “Right to Roam” is a very, very different thing. These people are politically driven and eaten with envy and jealousy. No one should have the right to just go or camp where they want, purely ridiculous, and if you have seen what I have seen……..You would agree I’m sure.
And yet it works very well in Scotland and Scandinavia- do you have any direct experience of land access in these countries?
And having described public land use and access rights in Scotland and Scandinavia as 'purely ridiculous' three times now, can you go into any more detail as to what you mean?
The growing number of English residents who want to see a 'Right to Roam' act in England come from all walks of life. Some are members of the Ramblers, some are members of the group 'Right to Roam', some are members of the Open Spaces Society, some are members of none of these. Some are landowners and millionaires, some live in tower blocks. Some are politically active, some are not. Unsurprisingly, those trying hardest to make the change they want
have to be politically active, given that change will only happen through the political system.
Stating that everyone who wants a Scottish-style right to roam in England are 'politically driven and eaten with envy and jealousy', and referring to them as 'these people' suggests you are not aware of any of the above.
I fully expect to see a right to roam in England in my lifetime, and I'd rather it was sooner than later! Public attitudes are changing, thankfully, and the value of connection to nature is slowly being recognised...