Woodlore or SBT? I've had both and now only have one of them: the SBT. The reason for this is simple - it is the superior knife, in my opinion. The blade shape, the depth of grind, the thickness of the blade stock, handle material (and I am normally a champion of wooden handles) and quality of manufacture make it better.
In use, the SBT is much easier and more versatile across the range of applications in bushcraft, be it carving, butchery, making feather sticks, producing sparks - anything, really, around the camp/wood.
The problem with both of them stems from their justified popularity. The wait for either knife is lengthy to say the least; the price for them can be similarly terrifying - especially so for the Woodlore.
Ultimately, you make your decision about which one will best suit your needs. That said, I still reckon that the SBT is better in almost every area - a judgement that comes from having owned and used both tools.
In use, the SBT is much easier and more versatile across the range of applications in bushcraft, be it carving, butchery, making feather sticks, producing sparks - anything, really, around the camp/wood.
The problem with both of them stems from their justified popularity. The wait for either knife is lengthy to say the least; the price for them can be similarly terrifying - especially so for the Woodlore.
Ultimately, you make your decision about which one will best suit your needs. That said, I still reckon that the SBT is better in almost every area - a judgement that comes from having owned and used both tools.