As an aside...I was on a walk in a new area for me which included quite a few coniferous tree stands in among grouse moorland. SOme were forestry commission but I think others were private. Anyway I was walking through on a bridleway that followed a track to the top of a hill with wood on both sides. About 4 steps into the woods I notices a poor but determined attempt at a shelter. It was made by supporting branches between three standing and healthy trees with a few props where needed and cut branches over the top to try and give it a roof. The whole thing was about 6'3" tall inside (6'5" ismy height and I only just had to duck). What do you think of that shelter? I did spot half attempts of other kinds of wood based shelters near this one, in fact about 3 or 4 all around this one. The wood looked like it was cut down and the roof branches had fresh looking needles on them.
I might be jumping to conclusions in thinking these shelters were not appropriate in that they probably used fresh wood and did not have permission. I didn't have time to see if any trees were damaged but I'd guess it is bad practice to build shelters directly onto living trees unless it is needed for shelter for real. As far as I know the FC do not allow bushcraft type shelters to be made on their land, I could be totally wrong on that. At the very least if permission was granted to someone or some group then surely the responsible thing would be to do it away from paths and tracks? This was on the main path up to a memorial that is a popular walking route too.
Is that not another bad example of bushcraft? Although I suspect the actual damage isn't anywhere as bad as the damaged trees in the OP's case.
I might be jumping to conclusions in thinking these shelters were not appropriate in that they probably used fresh wood and did not have permission. I didn't have time to see if any trees were damaged but I'd guess it is bad practice to build shelters directly onto living trees unless it is needed for shelter for real. As far as I know the FC do not allow bushcraft type shelters to be made on their land, I could be totally wrong on that. At the very least if permission was granted to someone or some group then surely the responsible thing would be to do it away from paths and tracks? This was on the main path up to a memorial that is a popular walking route too.
Is that not another bad example of bushcraft? Although I suspect the actual damage isn't anywhere as bad as the damaged trees in the OP's case.