Up until now when a ground fire wasn't possible I would do as many other's do and grab the hobo stove, but I have always had an urdge to make a trail stove after reading scoop's article and seeing the woodland edge version in action. so I did....
stove collapsed for transport
ready to go
in action
I was as happy as a sandboy seeing the stove lit for the first time,but this quickly wore off and this is where I would like some feedback from anyone with a similar stove, the problem is, it's just too slow.
I filled my 12cm billy with a litre of water for the test, but after 25 minutes I got fed up waiting for it to boil.
So I switched to my trusty hobo and went right back to basics. As you can see the stove is placed right on the ground(brick's), no grills, stands, plates etc inside, just filled it with wood the same as the trail and lit it.
After about 10 mins I had a good rolling boil.
Back to the trail stove, I actually like the design of these stove's, they are easy to keep filled with fuel and stop your pans getting sooty (when they work )
I have been thinking of reasons for its poor performance, I know there is a problem with the airflow through the stove, I couldnt fit the back piece as it smoked too much and was obviously starving the stove of air, maybe the chimbney's too small?
I also think the top plate is maybe too thick to transfer the heat efficiently, it was all scrap stainless so I don't know the exact thickness, will have to get the vernier on it when I am back in work.
It would be nice to compare times if anyone else has built something similar or any ideas were I have gone wrong
I dont regret making the stove and may be able to improve its performance, but for now I think I will have to stick with the hobo for its simplicity in design, weight (trail stove topped in at 1.5kg) ,speed and it used about half the amount of wood. And now that I've got it out of my system I can move onto knives
stove collapsed for transport
ready to go
in action
I was as happy as a sandboy seeing the stove lit for the first time,but this quickly wore off and this is where I would like some feedback from anyone with a similar stove, the problem is, it's just too slow.
I filled my 12cm billy with a litre of water for the test, but after 25 minutes I got fed up waiting for it to boil.
So I switched to my trusty hobo and went right back to basics. As you can see the stove is placed right on the ground(brick's), no grills, stands, plates etc inside, just filled it with wood the same as the trail and lit it.
After about 10 mins I had a good rolling boil.
Back to the trail stove, I actually like the design of these stove's, they are easy to keep filled with fuel and stop your pans getting sooty (when they work )
I have been thinking of reasons for its poor performance, I know there is a problem with the airflow through the stove, I couldnt fit the back piece as it smoked too much and was obviously starving the stove of air, maybe the chimbney's too small?
I also think the top plate is maybe too thick to transfer the heat efficiently, it was all scrap stainless so I don't know the exact thickness, will have to get the vernier on it when I am back in work.
It would be nice to compare times if anyone else has built something similar or any ideas were I have gone wrong
I dont regret making the stove and may be able to improve its performance, but for now I think I will have to stick with the hobo for its simplicity in design, weight (trail stove topped in at 1.5kg) ,speed and it used about half the amount of wood. And now that I've got it out of my system I can move onto knives