I would have to say that that I agree with pretty much all that has been said regarding the Condor.
Yes the back system it more complicated than the fixed back system of the crusader/Vulcan, but it is much more comfortable, and the capability“of the fly” adjustment means that you can adjust the fit and balance of the pack throughout the day, which means less fatigue.
The pockets are a bit more fiddly, but not too much,although I would concur the PLCE pockets are a much better option
As for comparisons with SF range, well for me, the PRI offerings are excellent well made items, of similar or equal quality to the original Karrimor items.
Some of the fabrics are updated (in less durable but more “comfortable”alternatives), but the designs are not much changed. In my experience having tried and used the Condor 60-80 extensively (I also have the optional side pockets) and had more limited use of the Sabre 60-100 (it’s a mates) I would say that although the straps are a bit more contoured, there is not much, if any thing in it. Again the material used in the back system is no where as durable as my older sac and I don’t think it would last anywhere near as long as the old timer.
I would also extend my comments to the Sabre 45 / Hot Route rucsac.
Again the newer sacs are very well made and comfortable.
The older ones are better made, in relation to durable fabrics, and I have never suffered in the comfort stakes.
Anyway, ramble over.
My only point (if any at all) is that it would be daft to disregard old Karrimor sacks in favour of the more de rigueur Crusader/Vulcan options.
The older Karrimor sacs are also available in green
Cheers
Chris