Redfield Tracker 3x9x40 in matte
See http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3694855043
I'm the seller BTW
See http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3694855043
I'm the seller BTW
Lurch said:I do a bit of long range crow sniping using a Tikka T3 in .223 rem, for that even on 9x mag I find it a bit too vague. Just my preference.
There are three numbers because it has variable magnification. So 3 is the lowest mag, 9 is the highest and 40 refers to the objective lens size. (I think!)
Lurch said:I'd love to get a Leupold or similar, but a bit beyond my reach at the minute.
Buckshot said:If you're talking expensive, I think Swarsoski beat S&B hands down.
I've used both and have a Swarsoski on my .308
The optical quality is far better.
The problem is the price, it cost more than the rifle (Sako 75) and moderator combined. But then I'm not expecting to buy a replacement for many years, if ever ...
I think it was worth it. :super:
Cheers
Mark
leon-1 said:How much does one click on a tower equate to @ 100 meters.