I am sure if you talked to folk who hunt/fish and do outdoorsy stuff in Sweden you would get more of the passed down through the generations stuff complete with useless actions/folklore etc.
Except that often the useless folklore would be the finishing touch to safety. Tell a child it is dangerous to go near the well and they'll run out to find out what danger there really is. Anyone with kids will know the score.
Tell them there are evil gnomes that will pull them to the underworld and the child will usually stay away. Pretty useful in rural living communities before modern times.
No offense to religious people on board but humans seem hardwired to "some" form of spiritual belief. Waving the feather is a good example. If dad waved it before opening the box, it's gotta be part of the ritual.
And rituals are build up over long lines of experienced ancestors. Ergo, rituals give the best chance of survival.
Those that are daring either discover new inventive things or end their line of the genepool. Mimicing is safest and the ones that are prudent are those that can pass their genes right?
Ben, the example of the Swedish ham is an old story. It knows many shapes and forms, usually with a skillet or oven. BS to your student I'd say.
With how many children and primates has this experiment been conducted? Has it been repeated by others? If so, who and how often?
What were their findings? What were the criteria of the children and primates chosen for the experiment?
Which experiments exactly were conducted to come to the pretty spicy conclusion that children will always mimic parent's behavior? What were the circumstances of the experiment? The actual surroundings cos they will influence both parents and children plus primates as well?
If the opaque box is the only example the experiment holds no value. I'd be interested to learn more cos your assessment can be valuable but I need way more info then just the opaque box story.