Hi,
I'm looking at the various cheap polycotton combat trousers options, british lightweight and M-65 mainly. I cannot see them "in the flesh" so would like to get some advise if possible.
Some reference points and preferences:
- I own a Fjallraven Greenland Jeans and have owned a Forester. I like the fabric but did not like the Forester cut too much (a bit baggy - I could do with it but not for the price).
- I have owned Craghoppers Kiwis and really disliked both the cut and the fabric (noisy, stuffy).
- I like high waist but would like to avoid an overly baggy cut and military look (I would probably dye them in dark brown)
- I don't use leg pockets much and would happily do without for a more civil look
The options I saw are:
a/ British Army lighweight (http://www.factsurplus.co.uk/product/732) apparently some come without leg pocket, some with one
b/ M65 Combat trousers (http://www.factsurplus.co.uk/product/3)
c/ Austrian ripstop: http://www.factsurplus.co.uk/product/801
d/ Combat. Ref 901S. 6-Pocket. B.D.U Style. Sand. frm Endicott and stated as fitted rather than baggy but also described as "semi-decent quality", whatever this means: http://www.endicotts.co.uk/product_info.php?cPath=77&products_id=2265
e/ Com-Pant. Multi-Pkt. 'Rip-Stop'. Poly/Cotton. O/G. from Endicott (http://www.endicotts.co.uk/product_info.php?cPath=77&products_id=2398)
It would be great if you could comment on the differences between some of those models or even suggest other alternatives.
Cheers
P.
I'm looking at the various cheap polycotton combat trousers options, british lightweight and M-65 mainly. I cannot see them "in the flesh" so would like to get some advise if possible.
Some reference points and preferences:
- I own a Fjallraven Greenland Jeans and have owned a Forester. I like the fabric but did not like the Forester cut too much (a bit baggy - I could do with it but not for the price).
- I have owned Craghoppers Kiwis and really disliked both the cut and the fabric (noisy, stuffy).
- I like high waist but would like to avoid an overly baggy cut and military look (I would probably dye them in dark brown)
- I don't use leg pockets much and would happily do without for a more civil look
The options I saw are:
a/ British Army lighweight (http://www.factsurplus.co.uk/product/732) apparently some come without leg pocket, some with one
b/ M65 Combat trousers (http://www.factsurplus.co.uk/product/3)
c/ Austrian ripstop: http://www.factsurplus.co.uk/product/801
d/ Combat. Ref 901S. 6-Pocket. B.D.U Style. Sand. frm Endicott and stated as fitted rather than baggy but also described as "semi-decent quality", whatever this means: http://www.endicotts.co.uk/product_info.php?cPath=77&products_id=2265
e/ Com-Pant. Multi-Pkt. 'Rip-Stop'. Poly/Cotton. O/G. from Endicott (http://www.endicotts.co.uk/product_info.php?cPath=77&products_id=2398)
It would be great if you could comment on the differences between some of those models or even suggest other alternatives.
Cheers
P.