Rebel - I've been getting some help from the Hainault winter twigs ID site (they have other
sections too, eg summer flowers) - today I spotted hazel, black poplar and willow (to be
honest it was pretty obvious that it was a willow but it was cool to see that the twigs
matched up reasonably well), as well as silver birch, ash, horse chestnuts and London
planes. A couple of weeks ago it was nearly all limes where I went, so it was nice to see
something a bit more varied today.
Hainault winter twigs
http://www.hainaultforest.co.uk/3Winter twigs.htm
I've also got the Collins Field Guide to Trees which is partially helpful - I think it will be
more use, when leaves appear, for the visuals although the written descriptions of things
in winter are very good, and that helped to confirm the hazel for me.
What I want is a website that shows what bark looks like!
I suppose there's a danger of focussing on bits of tree (twigs, leaves, bark, overall shape
of crown) and not seeing the tree for the twigs
Reading the intro to the Collins book the guy talks about the difficulty of identifying trees
as a beginner and how you can be holding twigs/leaves from three similar species and
struggling to distinguish them but after a while you could spot each of the trees as you
whiz past on a train hehe.
It would be nice to look at a tree and recognise it, in the same way that I could recognise
someone I know from a distance but at the moment there's a lot of peering, squinting and
consulting sheaves of paper printed from the web - and probably attracting puzzled looks
from passersby!
I wonder if I am using consciously the same processes that I use unconsciously to
recognise faces and people or if it's something quite different (but still pattern
recognition). As I'm typing this I am pondering whether or not my bewilderment at trees
is anything like the sort of amnesia where you can no longer recognise people (by which
I don't mean to belittle amnesia, just considering the processes involved).