I recently applied for a better job with my employer. I'm currently working on a funded project which ends this month, so after July I'll basically be unemployed. You can imagine how delighted I was when a job opening came up. The job is basically more of what I have been doing for the last 3 years. The job title is what is currently written on my office door.
I've been with my current employer for around 9 years, and in my current role for 3. Before this job was even announced publicly, the person responsible for hiring came to my office and told me what date the application would go live, and asked me to apply. They even asked me when I could start. You know how sometimes you hear about internal candidates being "pre-selected" for a post? Maybe I was being naive, but that was what I thought this person was trying to convey to me by saying these things. This belief was further reinforced when I saw that the job was receiving only a bare minimum of advertising. None of the usual job websites, just the in-house website only. I believed they were sandbagging it for me. To my annoyance someone not connected with the application decided to be "helpful" by posting the job to a mailing list I subscribe to. Even so I wasn't too worried. Everyone says I am good at my job, and I was sure that I could win even in a "fair" fight.
You can imagine my surprise when two days after the interviews (which I'm told I did excellent at) the same person who originally asked me to apply emailed me to say they were really sorry, but the job had gone to one of the external candidates that had responded to the advert. I was gutted. They said this person had more experience.
We'll survive, but we'll probably have to uproot the family from the area (which has been our home for 10 years) and go where the work is.
My mind has been going round in circles trying to figure this one out. I can accept that there may be someone with loads more experience in this area than me, but the thing is this is the sort of job that is meant to be a stepping stone. That means if they have a lot more experience than me, their career must have completely stagnated. Surely that would count against them?
In terms of qualifications I'm massively overqualified for the job as advertised, so if this person is better qualified than me, again you'd think it would be so much over the job spec that it started to count against them.
If they only have a little more experience than me, I'm surprised that where I acquired my experience doesn't seem to count for anything at all. I'd have hoped that in-house experience would carry additional weighting. Apparently not.
I think it is probably one of two things. Either:
A) I misread the signals of the person who asked me to apply when in fact they weren't going to do me any favours
or
B) They were trying to give me the job but overestimated their own influence and one of the higher-ups torpedoed my application for some reason.
Whadya think?
I've been with my current employer for around 9 years, and in my current role for 3. Before this job was even announced publicly, the person responsible for hiring came to my office and told me what date the application would go live, and asked me to apply. They even asked me when I could start. You know how sometimes you hear about internal candidates being "pre-selected" for a post? Maybe I was being naive, but that was what I thought this person was trying to convey to me by saying these things. This belief was further reinforced when I saw that the job was receiving only a bare minimum of advertising. None of the usual job websites, just the in-house website only. I believed they were sandbagging it for me. To my annoyance someone not connected with the application decided to be "helpful" by posting the job to a mailing list I subscribe to. Even so I wasn't too worried. Everyone says I am good at my job, and I was sure that I could win even in a "fair" fight.
You can imagine my surprise when two days after the interviews (which I'm told I did excellent at) the same person who originally asked me to apply emailed me to say they were really sorry, but the job had gone to one of the external candidates that had responded to the advert. I was gutted. They said this person had more experience.
We'll survive, but we'll probably have to uproot the family from the area (which has been our home for 10 years) and go where the work is.
My mind has been going round in circles trying to figure this one out. I can accept that there may be someone with loads more experience in this area than me, but the thing is this is the sort of job that is meant to be a stepping stone. That means if they have a lot more experience than me, their career must have completely stagnated. Surely that would count against them?
In terms of qualifications I'm massively overqualified for the job as advertised, so if this person is better qualified than me, again you'd think it would be so much over the job spec that it started to count against them.
If they only have a little more experience than me, I'm surprised that where I acquired my experience doesn't seem to count for anything at all. I'd have hoped that in-house experience would carry additional weighting. Apparently not.
I think it is probably one of two things. Either:
A) I misread the signals of the person who asked me to apply when in fact they weren't going to do me any favours
or
B) They were trying to give me the job but overestimated their own influence and one of the higher-ups torpedoed my application for some reason.
Whadya think?