I reckon it could do with a tad more weight... Or a rambo 3 style axe attachment lol ...
Parang XL Mini Review
- Thread starter JonathanD
- Start date
I reckon it could do with a tad more weight... Or a rambo 3 style axe attachment lol ...
I did a lot of work in the garden on Monday and took down a very large budlea. I pushed it so hard I chipped and rolled the edge which is in the process of being convexed by me.
I had a bit of carving to do to get the handle a bit more comfortable but I still got hot spots and will probably re - do mine myself with tufnol. So - thicken the blade edge a tad and a smooth handle and it's damn near perfect. Nothing I can't do myself really so it's all good.
I had a bit of carving to do to get the handle a bit more comfortable but I still got hot spots and will probably re - do mine myself with tufnol. So - thicken the blade edge a tad and a smooth handle and it's damn near perfect. Nothing I can't do myself really so it's all good.
If there aren't any lightening holes under the scales, and maybe even if there are some, the bolts could be relocated and the weight removal from drilling more holes would have the effect of making it a bit more blade heavy.
For the XL I have to agree with you there. I'm not too fussed about the actual weight, I think it's fine, but I feel that the blade has been thinned a shade too much and it makes it a bit too delicate. There have been reports of bending and rolling the edge, I've done that myself and straightened it out on the anvil easily enough, but I now feel that I have to be more careful with the blade than I'd like. I feel that the 6" doesn't suffer in this respect, the blade feels much more solid, but I can't abide the handle -- it's way too small for my hands, so I don't use it.
dont think it matters the grind looks like it takes all the weight out espesially at the front end dropping the gring hight to 1/2 at that point and convexin to the edge would improve it IMO (just from looking at pics not actually using it or holding one
)
dont think it matters the grind looks like it takes all the weight out espesially at the front end dropping the gring hight to 1/2 at that point and convexin to the edge would improve it IMO (just from looking at pics not actually using it or holding one
yeah, but it's good to know the starting thickness anyway.
According to here http://www.foxknivesusa.com/en/product/2426/fx-687_parang_xl.html
3.5mm so not a bad start must be tin foil thin by the look ot the grind at the edge
ATB
Duncan
3.5mm so not a bad start must be tin foil thin by the look ot the grind at the edge
ATB
Duncan
Blimey! I expected it to be a bit thicker but then I guess this is a parang, not a golok! It'll move well in the hand then.
Yeha, i had a tad of bending on the lilac last weekend. Nothing that my good friend mr hammer didn't enjoy.
That can usually be helped a bit by reprofiling the edge. Remove the edge down to a flat and then change the secondary bevel to a little steeper grind or even convexing it at that point. Depends on the steel and the hardness though. If it is a really low RC it may not help much
Last edited:
Hi all,
the Parang 6" is 6 mm thickness with a RC 59-60 Rockwell, and you may bring down almost all trees if you want. My only compliant with the Parang 6" is about the handle, too thin and elaborate with me.
The Parang XL is 3,5 mm thickness with a RC 56-57. The aim of the XL project was a Parang easy to use also for many hours for fresh woods. The hardness was choose so low to avoid breaks of the blade (a bend blade may fixed also on field) in case of contact with hard woods, stones etc.
Let's say the Parang 6" is an all-around camp-knife, the Parang XL is a more specialized knife, and so more delicate on a field use.
I guess if you want a Parang XL more robust a convex edge could help a bit.
Alfredo
the Parang 6" is 6 mm thickness with a RC 59-60 Rockwell, and you may bring down almost all trees if you want. My only compliant with the Parang 6" is about the handle, too thin and elaborate with me.
The Parang XL is 3,5 mm thickness with a RC 56-57. The aim of the XL project was a Parang easy to use also for many hours for fresh woods. The hardness was choose so low to avoid breaks of the blade (a bend blade may fixed also on field) in case of contact with hard woods, stones etc.
Let's say the Parang 6" is an all-around camp-knife, the Parang XL is a more specialized knife, and so more delicate on a field use.
I guess if you want a Parang XL more robust a convex edge could help a bit.
Alfredo
If you are going to go into Jungle conditions I would consider what the locals are using .... or check first before you go .....
Personally I have tried to find the ideal knife for these conditions for what seems to be "years" .... Valiant have supplied some nice ones for my uses but making the most of modern steels I have never found the "ideal" Parang shape ..... using the steel I would like .... being made by the right "western" maker .... and the Fox offering seems way off on comfort ..... and the steel thinness and temper don't look an ideal choice for hard wood ....
Valiant do a similar shape to the Fox in their Sumatra range which is thicker and much better on grip comfort ... that would be the closest to what you have in the Fox shape with suitability and comfort increased.....
Personally I have tried to find the ideal knife for these conditions for what seems to be "years" .... Valiant have supplied some nice ones for my uses but making the most of modern steels I have never found the "ideal" Parang shape ..... using the steel I would like .... being made by the right "western" maker .... and the Fox offering seems way off on comfort ..... and the steel thinness and temper don't look an ideal choice for hard wood ....
Valiant do a similar shape to the Fox in their Sumatra range which is thicker and much better on grip comfort ... that would be the closest to what you have in the Fox shape with suitability and comfort increased.....
Similar threads
