Our dependence on electricity
- Thread starter bb07
- Start date
-
Hey Guest, Early bird pricing on the Summer Moot (29th July - 10th August) available until April 6th, we'd love you to come. PLEASE CLICK HERE to early bird price and get more information.
I suppose the whole Nuclear/coal/oil/gas debate on this is a decoy...The reason we use all these methods is IIRC to produce steam to turn turbines...Therefore the argument is going to be which is the safest and cleanest way to produce steam...All except water turbines that is
There are no easy solutions, that is certain. Worldwide electrical demand will only increase. The only way it can be otherwise is for an event to occur which would drastically reduce the overall population. Quite simply, there are too many of us, but understandably, none of us wish to volunteer to be the first in line for the reduction.
Regarding nuclear: Proponents of nuclear power say it's safe. I disagree. It may be reasonably safe but it is definitely not without it's hazards. Touted as a clean source of energy (compared to coal) it is not without it's share of harmful effects or pollution. Uranium mining is itself a contentious issue, along with the problem of what to do with the spent fuel? Nothing is truly clean or green. It all requires resources expended to produce alternate resources, in this case being electricity.
In the future though, I truly believe that the world will simply have no choice but to turn to nuclear power to supply demand. Like it or not, sadly, I don't think we have a choice.
Regarding nuclear: Proponents of nuclear power say it's safe. I disagree. It may be reasonably safe but it is definitely not without it's hazards. Touted as a clean source of energy (compared to coal) it is not without it's share of harmful effects or pollution. Uranium mining is itself a contentious issue, along with the problem of what to do with the spent fuel? Nothing is truly clean or green. It all requires resources expended to produce alternate resources, in this case being electricity.
In the future though, I truly believe that the world will simply have no choice but to turn to nuclear power to supply demand. Like it or not, sadly, I don't think we have a choice.
Very true. Even being born is not without it's hazards
Yep, one in four pregnancies fail at some point...
![10633340095_bc8e73fdc7.jpg](http://[URL="http://www.flickr.com/photos/98692446@N07/10633340095/"][IMG]http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5488/10633340095_bc8e73fdc7.jpg)
And sadly even at 40 weeks it goes wrong sometimes...This is my daughters grave. She would have been 23 now.
But there are good times as well...
My eldest daughters graduation.
![9253406399_1ccd49787a.jpg](http://[URL="http://www.flickr.com/photos/98692446@N07/9253406399/"][IMG]http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2874/9253406399_1ccd49787a.jpg)
And my youngest daughter at her school presentation night.
![9317644030_ebdfa241ce.jpg](http://[URL="http://www.flickr.com/photos/76789218@N03/9317644030/"][IMG]http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7437/9317644030_ebdfa241ce.jpg)
wingstoo, you have my most sincere condolences. My comment was meant in a light hearted manner, without a thought to anyone actually being affected. Sometimes joking is in poor taste, my apologies
wingstoo, you have my most sincere condolences. My comment was meant in a light hearted manner, without a thought to anyone actually being affected. Sometimes joking is in poor taste, my apologies
No worries bb07, we all say things that on reflection we shouldn't have...
Strange how it may seem a lot of good came about because of our loss.
This is a small corner of a special childrens burial section of our local cemetery we had created after our loss.
![10633962154_1fff6cee2d.jpg](http://[URL="http://www.flickr.com/photos/98692446@N07/10633962154/"][IMG]http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3809/10633962154_1fff6cee2d.jpg)
And my eldest daughter works on the BNFL site for WS Atkins the civil engineer company, as an assistant costs analyst for the decommissioning project she lives in Whitehaven, just a few miles up the coast from the plant.
Last edited:
No worries bb07, we all say things that on reflection we shouldn't have...
Strange how it may seem a lot of good came about because of our loss.
This is a small corner of a special childrens burial section of our local cemetery we had created after our loss.
[/URL][/IMG]
And my eldest daughter works on the BNFL site for WS Atkins the civil engineer company, as an assistant costs analyst for the decommissioning project she lives in Whitehaven, just a few miles up the coast from the plant.
A good outcome born from a tragedy.
If the power goes off panic follows hence my support for reliable nuclear power; I ain't giving up my toys
you might not have a choice! whatcha gonna do once the power goes off? you cant rely on the govt, they'll be too busy looking after number 1!!
saw on the news about thorium nuclear power, so I did a bit of reading about it. Looks to make uranium nuclear power a bloody outrage, we had test reactors in the 60's but didn't develop them. Litttle waste, no meltdowns, waste quickly becomes safe, chenobyl wouldn't have existed, and the uranium from the 60's would be safe. What have they precicely been playing about at? Waste untouchable for 100,000 years ? Meltdowns and radiation poisoming ? I always had my alarm bell ringing when they talked about nuclear plants and their waste. Fucushima will cost 100 billion dollars to clean up, and unlivable for a good few years, chenobyl virtually glows at night.
I am given to believe that Thorium reactors could not produce the necessary materials for nuclear weapons, thus not of much use to the powers that were in the fifties through seventies.
So do you have another source that actually works? And doesn't cause global warming? Please don't say hydro, cause most environmentalists also oppose damning rivers and the ensuing ecological damage.
thorium nuclear, even helps dispose of plutonium. If you told aliens that you where operating uranium fission plants, creating lethal waste and nuclear meltdowns on the face of your planet, they wouldn't believe you. I'd be happy with thorium plants, but france, a country that produces alot of nuclear energy, now has a very big problem with waste and the cost. Burn coal rather than long lived radiation. I bet japan doesn't think nucular (< G.W.Bushism!) is cheap any more, and after 100,000 years of production and storage it won't be cheap to our kids. (Neptunium 2 million years!)
www.english.rfi.fr/economy/20120712-france-nuclear-waste-stocks-set-double-2030
www.extremetech.com/extreme/160131-...rovide-cleaner-safer-almost-waste-free-energy
as an alternative geothermal must be able to go along way, kenya in the rift valley produces loads, like iceland, I'm sure iceland could power most of europe and scicily and greece could do the rest. The us is hardly lacking in volcanism just like south america and japan. but thorium looks to be a goer, or just burn coal.
Edit:
actually they are already thinking of powering europe from iceland.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-voltage_direct_current
Last edited:
"Chernobyl actually glows"?
Funny that lots of people have moved back there then..........................
extract from Russia Today http://englishrussia.com/2013/04/26/chernobyl-today/4/ "These people already know which places are safe and which are better to avoid. And they do not need dosimeters. By the way, most of the places in Chernobyl have lower background radiation than Kiev."
Funny that lots of people have moved back there then..........................
extract from Russia Today http://englishrussia.com/2013/04/26/chernobyl-today/4/ "These people already know which places are safe and which are better to avoid. And they do not need dosimeters. By the way, most of the places in Chernobyl have lower background radiation than Kiev."
Last edited:
you cannot be serious
pripyat is the name of the ghost town, chernobyl the powerplant, the wind usually blows towards Kiev , lucky it wasnt that day, and the ?danube? flows through kiev.
www.chernobylwel.com/blog/new-sarcophagus-over-reactor-4/
edit:
did read your link, don't know whether it was the line "heavily controlled" or "best to view from a distance as it may contain something more lethal" that made me think that even though the Town of Chernobyl is 9 miles away it's still not free from the reactors influence 27 years later. There actually people who live full time in the exclusion zone for life and are fine, usually older people, and they lived there before 1986. And you can go for tours round pripyat, but you just cant move there from the uk.
Also a bit closer to home:
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-north-west-wales-24754181
Last edited:
Ah - did someone tread on your "Chernobyl glows" comment with a fact or two?!
As background radiation in Chernobyl is lower than Kiev, does that mean Kiev glows twice as much? Lucky that no-one lives anywhere near Kiev then..................
well alot of peoples lives are still messed up as result.
Attachments
Geothermal has some promise; just how much remains to be seen. Coal is a non-starter from an environmental point of view. Not only does it pollute the air in ways we've knowm for quite a while, it's one of the major contributor's to global warming. That said, I expect demand will cause it to be used for a long time to come.