One for Harvestman !!
- Thread starter Robbi
- Start date
Cool. You should have put that picture up in his ID thread and led him a merry dance before revealing the source. That would have been fun 
Cool. You should have put that picture up in his ID thread and led him a merry dance before revealing the source. That would have been fun
I have a picture of a hoop snake for you to ID....
I have a picture of a hoop snake for you to ID....
If it's anything like the picture of that trouser snake you sent me, I'm ringing the rozzers right now.
<Yawn>, old hat mate. I've known about this for ages. You see, they were first sighted in 1903 by Ebeneezer Attercop, whilst on the run from justice...
Oh alright, I'll stop.
Seriously, thank you ever sop much for posting the link. My dad has been oin to me for weeks, asking if I knew about the new spider from America, which I didn't. Now I do.
What a fantastic looking thing, and an even cooler name "Trogloraptor" That's got Velociraptor beaten easily.
Amazingly primitive looking thing, but then, if the way you are works, why change?
(Come to think of it, there's a few managers at work with that philosophy, and 'amazingly primitive' describes them rather well too...)
That picture is of a male. females would presumably be larger and more robust, if less leggy. Would love to see one, especially from different angles.
Got to go googling now...
Oh alright, I'll stop.
Seriously, thank you ever sop much for posting the link. My dad has been oin to me for weeks, asking if I knew about the new spider from America, which I didn't. Now I do.
What a fantastic looking thing, and an even cooler name "Trogloraptor"
That's got Velociraptor beaten easily.Amazingly primitive looking thing, but then, if the way you are works, why change?
(Come to think of it, there's a few managers at work with that philosophy, and 'amazingly primitive' describes them rather well too...)
That picture is of a male. females would presumably be larger and more robust, if less leggy. Would love to see one, especially from different angles.
Got to go googling now...
...females would presumably be larger and more robust, if less leggy. Would love to see one, especially from different angles.
Got to go googling now...
Pervert! .
4cm across, including legs. Hardly scary, unless you happen to be smaller than it.
Wimp.
I only wanted to see how many eyes it has, and what its teeth looked like.
Genitalia were obvious in the original pic anyway. It is clearly a haplogyne spider, which means in the female there is nothing to see anyway.
So there.
And that's why I like snakes. You have to get something in there to confirm the sex. All hands on, none of this visual rubbish.
Er.. OK, so that may sound a little perverted. But to each his own.
Unfortunately, I'm a breast and leg man, so snakes leave me frustrated.
Er.. OK, so that may sound a little perverted. But to each his own.
Unfortunately, I'm a breast and leg man, so snakes leave me frustrated.
Similar threads
