Nelson Mandela

  • Hey Guest, Early bird pricing on the Summer Moot (29th July - 10th August) available until April 6th, we'd love you to come. PLEASE CLICK HERE to early bird price and get more information.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Stringmaker

Native
Sep 6, 2010
1,891
1
UK
Nothing particularly against him, I just feel uncomfortable with the image of him as a cross between Gandhi (the popular view of Gandhi, anyway), Schweitzer, and the Angel Gabriel a bit silly. I prefer my public figures to be looked at in the round rather than their positive aspects praised to the skies and their less edifying acts and characteristics denied. I find it a function of our society's rather naive world-view, in which everyone has to be either an unredeemed villain or an unspotted hero.

No doubt one for the historians.

I agree....
 

treadlightly

Full Member
Jan 29, 2007
2,692
3
65
Powys
He wasn't perfect (never pretended to be) and he was involved in an armed struggle against a brutal, oppressive and unjust regime. What marks him out for me was that he publicly forgave his captors on release from prison, an example which allowed a new South Africa to exist and avoided much bloodshed. So, for me, he was one of the very, very few heroic figures of modern times.
 
Jul 30, 2012
3,570
224
westmidlands
Nothing particularly against him, I just feel uncomfortable with the image of him as a cross between Gandhi (the popular view of Gandhi, anyway), Schweitzer, and the Angel Gabriel a bit silly. I prefer my public figures to be looked at in the round rather than their positive aspects praised to the skies and their less edifying acts and characteristics denied. I find it a function of our society's rather naive world-view, in which everyone has to be either an unredeemed villain or an unspotted hero.

No doubt one for the historians.

mee too.

Ghandi and mandella where leaders, but at this very time he is being made out to be a virtual prophet. No one ever seems to remember he didn't really wish the events to occour, and was a creation of his environment. I feel sorry for him like I feel sorry for other prople who become figureheads almost against their will (celebrity culture). He himself was a nice man, but this idolism creates a power inbalance and only leads to problems in the future.
 

British Red

M.A.B (Mad About Bushcraft)
Dec 30, 2005
26,718
1,964
Mercia
Nothing particularly against him, I just feel uncomfortable with the image of him as a cross between Gandhi (the popular view of Gandhi, anyway), Schweitzer, and the Angel Gabriel a bit silly. I prefer my public figures to be looked at in the round rather than their positive aspects praised to the skies and their less edifying acts and characteristics denied. I find it a function of our society's rather naive world-view, in which everyone has to be either an unredeemed villain or an unspotted hero.

Well said sir
 

oldtimer

Full Member
Sep 27, 2005
3,202
1,827
82
Oxfordshire and Pyrenees-Orientales, France
It is a privilege to have been alive at the same time as him and to be old enough to have been witness to the struggle in which he succeeded against the odds. His major triumph was to bring reconciliation when bloodshed and horror were seemingly inevitable.

His example should be the touchstone for all politicians.

Not perfect? He was a human being.
 

mrcharly

Bushcrafter (boy, I've got a lot to say!)
Jan 25, 2011
3,257
44
North Yorkshire, UK
He wasn't perfect (never pretended to be) and he was involved in an armed struggle against a brutal, oppressive and unjust regime. What marks him out for me was that he publicly forgave his captors on release from prison, an example which allowed a new South Africa to exist and avoided much bloodshed. So, for me, he was one of the very, very few heroic figures of modern times.

This, in spades.

Anyone can remain angry and aggressive. To pull together so many groups who were in conflict, to lead by example; that is what made him great.
 

Andy BB

Full Member
Apr 19, 2010
3,290
1
Hampshire
I like to think it was guilt that made him play the peacemaker - after all, he had the blood of many innocent women and children on his hands. Ironically, most of them were black - thats the problem with indiscriminate bombing.

The phrase that comes to mind now is "Apres moi, la deluge". Many whites in SA saw him a a barrier between them and the worst excesses of a Zimbabwe situation - I'm betting that there will be a major outflow of whites now.
 

Stringmaker

Native
Sep 6, 2010
1,891
1
UK
As long as it doesn't get locked I think this thread is a healthy discussion.

All of the media outlets are deifying him.
 
Jul 3, 2013
399
0
United Kingdom
Political change of that magnitude usually involves a combination of the sword and the olive branch. There are two generally accepted tests of whether violence can be justified: firstly, are the goals achievable? Violence without hope of success cannot be justified, if it becomes apparent that violence will not work it is immoral to continue inflicting it. Second, picking the right time to sheath the sword and offer the olive branch.

On both those counts, both Mandela and De Klerk score reasonably well. There were of course many other factors such as economic and diplomatic isolation, as well as the threat of violence, which helped push the minority-rule government into finding a peaceful solution - there is a very good film called 'Endgame' which details this quite well.
 

santaman2000

M.A.B (Mad About Bushcraft)
Jan 15, 2011
16,909
1,114
67
Florida
I was still in England when Madela was becoming known to the world. Of course at the time it was jis struggle and his positive attributes that were in the news. It wasn't until at least a decade later that his darker side came to light.

As others have said, he was a man, not a saint. But he did accomplish much and is to be admired for that. As to how much bad he was associated with? Well, we'll never really know in our generation; the emotions of the chroniclers are still too high. History will likely tell the whole story after the emotions have subsided.

As for now, I prefer to remember the good he did. There'll be time enough for critisism later. Right now, the world needs heros more than villains. If the popular view is romanticized, so what?
 

Mesquite

It is what it is.
Mar 5, 2008
27,890
2,942
62
~Hemel Hempstead~
I was still in England when Madela was becoming known to the world. Of course at the time it was jis struggle and his positive attributes that were in the news. It wasn't until at least a decade later that his darker side came to light.

As others have said, he was a man, not a saint. But he did accomplish much and is to be admired for that. As to how much bad he was associated with? Well, we'll never really know in our generation; the emotions of the chroniclers are still too high. History will likely tell the whole story after the emotions have subsided.

As for now, I prefer to remember the good he did. There'll be time enough for critisism later. Right now, the world needs heros more than villains. If the popular view is romanticized, so what?

Fair comment SM
 

British Red

M.A.B (Mad About Bushcraft)
Dec 30, 2005
26,718
1,964
Mercia
Its interesting looking back on that period - I believe that if you want to single out a figure who brought about a relatively peaceful power shift, Desmond Tutu and his advocacy for disinvestment had a much more material (and far less bloody) effect than the activities of Mandela's Umkhonto we Sizwe. He was also preaching reconciliation way back in the apartheid days. He is still active on the big issues - HIV and TB, contraception and women's rights amongst them.

The reason for mentioning Tutu is to point out that others were instrumental in South African change - and more effective - without the need for bombs and bullets.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

BCUK Shop

We have a a number of knives, T-Shirts and other items for sale.

SHOP HERE