Nothing particularly against him, I just feel uncomfortable with the image of him as a cross between Gandhi (the popular view of Gandhi, anyway), Schweitzer, and the Angel Gabriel a bit silly. I prefer my public figures to be looked at in the round rather than their positive aspects praised to the skies and their less edifying acts and characteristics denied. I find it a function of our society's rather naive world-view, in which everyone has to be either an unredeemed villain or an unspotted hero.
No doubt one for the historians.
Nothing particularly against him, I just feel uncomfortable with the image of him as a cross between Gandhi (the popular view of Gandhi, anyway), Schweitzer, and the Angel Gabriel a bit silly. I prefer my public figures to be looked at in the round rather than their positive aspects praised to the skies and their less edifying acts and characteristics denied. I find it a function of our society's rather naive world-view, in which everyone has to be either an unredeemed villain or an unspotted hero.
No doubt one for the historians.
Nothing particularly against him, I just feel uncomfortable with the image of him as a cross between Gandhi (the popular view of Gandhi, anyway), Schweitzer, and the Angel Gabriel a bit silly. I prefer my public figures to be looked at in the round rather than their positive aspects praised to the skies and their less edifying acts and characteristics denied. I find it a function of our society's rather naive world-view, in which everyone has to be either an unredeemed villain or an unspotted hero.
He wasn't perfect (never pretended to be) and he was involved in an armed struggle against a brutal, oppressive and unjust regime. What marks him out for me was that he publicly forgave his captors on release from prison, an example which allowed a new South Africa to exist and avoided much bloodshed. So, for me, he was one of the very, very few heroic figures of modern times.
for me, once a terrorist always a terrorist, its like the IRA, good riddance.
for me, once a terrorist always a terrorist, its like the IRA, good riddance.
I was still in England when Madela was becoming known to the world. Of course at the time it was jis struggle and his positive attributes that were in the news. It wasn't until at least a decade later that his darker side came to light.
As others have said, he was a man, not a saint. But he did accomplish much and is to be admired for that. As to how much bad he was associated with? Well, we'll never really know in our generation; the emotions of the chroniclers are still too high. History will likely tell the whole story after the emotions have subsided.
As for now, I prefer to remember the good he did. There'll be time enough for critisism later. Right now, the world needs heros more than villains. If the popular view is romanticized, so what?