Nothing particularly against him, I just feel uncomfortable with the image of him as a cross between Gandhi (the popular view of Gandhi, anyway), Schweitzer, and the Angel Gabriel a bit silly. I prefer my public figures to be looked at in the round rather than their positive aspects praised to the skies and their less edifying acts and characteristics denied. I find it a function of our society's rather naive world-view, in which everyone has to be either an unredeemed villain or an unspotted hero.
No doubt one for the historians.