Lk35

[TemplarRA]

So I've finally bit the bullet and gone for the much loved LK35 from the Swedes and yes I know they are super affordable but not one for change lo,l now I can't wait to have it arrive, my ruck for the past few years has served me well but when wet it holds water terribly. Any negative views on the LK35?

 

[Philster]

It's not super-light, needs a waist belt if carrying over 10kg in it for comfort and could do with being a tiny bit bigger. But it is a classic pack!

 

[TemplarRA]

That's great thanks for the heads up.

Sent from my LG-H850 using Tapatalk

 

[mousey]

Some don't find the frame comfortable. If you have the right body shape for it it seems fine. I mounted mine on a downeast 1603 frame. Some have put extra pouches on the sides, I found the plce side pouches just about fit on the side, so with some extra zips I've put a pair on mine.

Haven't really used mine enough to form an opinion yet, but I do like it.

 

[SGL70]

Having humped the LK35 professionally for some time, I have a love/hate relationship. 5% love and 95% hate....

That said, it is very good value for money and something that can be used for coming generations, like as not.

Greger

 

[Janne]

I had the "pleasure" of having used both the 35 and 70 while in the army. The frame construction is awful is all I can say!

The bag is very good though. Superb quality, as everything made for the Swedish Armed forces in the past.

 

[Johnnyboy1971]

I had a swap about with my lk packs and mounted the 35 bag on to the medic pack frame which is a touch taller and wider. I have used a hippo pad for a waist belt and the straps are now a harness from Hill People Gear.

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk