Your data may be true, but the last statement that 'women claim society is unfair to them' is a gross generalisation TBH.
If it's a gross generalisation, it should be easy to find counter examples. I would be interested to see them.
Even the argument about quality is framed in a sexist pro-women way. What can be more important than your right to life, or life expectancy. Surely that is the most important right! Yet, I have not once in my entire life, read or heard of anyone else saying that Men's right to life is an issue that should be dealt with before lesser issues like equal pay.
And, let's not forget that in the 20th century, millions of MEN died in two world wars. MEN made great sacrifices for the benefit of women. Yet, when we hear about "sexual equality", we never hear about the way women profiteered safe at home whilst men endured the most appalling conditions and many died.
Now, let us imagine that it was the other way around. That millions of women had died in WWII, whilst men sat at home and got extra money taking over women's jobs. Then imagine that women died earlier than men and that the bulk of health care funding went to men. There is no doubt whatsoever of the response from women demanding "equality".
The simple fact, the equality movement is the most sexist movement in modern society, deliberately ignoring all the very substantial issues affecting men such as lower life expectancy and a century of attacks on men's interests, by framing the supposed "equality" debate in such a way that it is extremely unfair and unequal and focussing only on the few, relatively minor issues of "equality" that only benefit women.
And, as was just shown today here, if a man dares to highlight the way society is unfair to men ... out come the attack dogs. Because men aren't allowed to demand fairness.