So....i wanted a nice hb ax but i got worried about the heads loosening.
Its a common occurance when googled and the most common thing said is its not designed for heavy work,fit your own handle etc
I like to know the history of tools so tried to look into the history of this particular pattern.
The originals sent from europe had rounded eyes and probably designed for friction fit handles,made on the fly.
So is the modern interpretations where its a fixed,wedged handle the issue?
Did trying to improve one aspect of a tool put a flaw into the design?
Would rinaldi style friction fit handles and eye suit a hb pattern head better?
Thoughts?
Its a common occurance when googled and the most common thing said is its not designed for heavy work,fit your own handle etc
I like to know the history of tools so tried to look into the history of this particular pattern.
The originals sent from europe had rounded eyes and probably designed for friction fit handles,made on the fly.
So is the modern interpretations where its a fixed,wedged handle the issue?
Did trying to improve one aspect of a tool put a flaw into the design?
Would rinaldi style friction fit handles and eye suit a hb pattern head better?
Thoughts?