There was a comment someone made that went along the lines that bought seeds when grown on for seeds which later turn out hybridized can still not be shared for money or not. It made me think along the lines that seed companies kind of want the genes in their seeds recorded as theirs irrespective of their sale or hybridization.
It reminds me of companies trying to patent genes. IIRC there were companies that discovered human genes that have a positive outcome. They patented it despite the fact that it was a natural set of human genes in the public domain if you like. The genes in the seeds are in the public domain so control is hard unless you control the sharing of the seeds. But the genes in the seeds are not theirs. They got paid for any development expenses when the packet was bought. Why should they get a second bite of the cherry?
I'm for trade description for commercial reasons but non-commercial seeds shared by enthusiastic activists should be exempt. Also smaller concerns should not be priced out of the market. I believe there are several pieces of legislation out there that exempt not for profit or small trading companies get relief for other things. Not hard amendment to draft just model it on similar legislation that works for other things.
Rambling and confused argument sorry. Basically I feel the legislation is not completely wrong just badly written/conceived with probably good motives getting subverted in ways that favour certain parties at the expense of others. Perhaps we just need better quality legislators!
It reminds me of companies trying to patent genes. IIRC there were companies that discovered human genes that have a positive outcome. They patented it despite the fact that it was a natural set of human genes in the public domain if you like. The genes in the seeds are in the public domain so control is hard unless you control the sharing of the seeds. But the genes in the seeds are not theirs. They got paid for any development expenses when the packet was bought. Why should they get a second bite of the cherry?
I'm for trade description for commercial reasons but non-commercial seeds shared by enthusiastic activists should be exempt. Also smaller concerns should not be priced out of the market. I believe there are several pieces of legislation out there that exempt not for profit or small trading companies get relief for other things. Not hard amendment to draft just model it on similar legislation that works for other things.
Rambling and confused argument sorry. Basically I feel the legislation is not completely wrong just badly written/conceived with probably good motives getting subverted in ways that favour certain parties at the expense of others. Perhaps we just need better quality legislators!