Red,
I totally agree with your right to do as you please on your land as long as it doesn't affect others. It's a freedom I would fight for you for.
As you say as long as it doesn't affect others. I was maybe a bit sweeping when I said folk should be licenced. I definitely think they should be for work and commercial gain. There is an argument that your use of pesticides and heavy equipment could affect others either through contamination/run-off and or some-one being endangered coming in to rescue you if you get into a bad situation /have an accident. But we're getting into semantics and politics there and that'll just cause an argument that's not allowed. So I withdraw my statement about forcing licences.
I do feel that that although you've been using them for years you do seem to have a natural bent for it where-as the OP was saying they didn't have a clue. A chainsaw is a hugely powerful tool and things can happen very very fast, it'll slice through (mincing as it goes) and or kicking back more quickly than most will be able to react too. The consequences can be fatal or at least devastating. Unable to work, trauma to victim and family, not able to pay bills. Is it worth it for the sake of a fraction of the cost of the saw to equip oneself with the proper PPE? OK a short training course isn't cheap, but once someone has the training (professional or otherwise) it's there and the recipient no longer needs to renew it if not for commercial gain?
I just feel having witnessed folk without your skill (and luck) recommending to a novice to just go out and get one willy-nilly is remiss (to me) and especially as you are so highly thought of.
I'm not saying any of it as an attack and we all have our opinions and rights to air them, I was just concerned for the prospective buyer.
Look forward to more posts from us all, I always enjoy reading yours.
ATB,
Colin.
I totally agree with your right to do as you please on your land as long as it doesn't affect others. It's a freedom I would fight for you for.
As you say as long as it doesn't affect others. I was maybe a bit sweeping when I said folk should be licenced. I definitely think they should be for work and commercial gain. There is an argument that your use of pesticides and heavy equipment could affect others either through contamination/run-off and or some-one being endangered coming in to rescue you if you get into a bad situation /have an accident. But we're getting into semantics and politics there and that'll just cause an argument that's not allowed. So I withdraw my statement about forcing licences.
I do feel that that although you've been using them for years you do seem to have a natural bent for it where-as the OP was saying they didn't have a clue. A chainsaw is a hugely powerful tool and things can happen very very fast, it'll slice through (mincing as it goes) and or kicking back more quickly than most will be able to react too. The consequences can be fatal or at least devastating. Unable to work, trauma to victim and family, not able to pay bills. Is it worth it for the sake of a fraction of the cost of the saw to equip oneself with the proper PPE? OK a short training course isn't cheap, but once someone has the training (professional or otherwise) it's there and the recipient no longer needs to renew it if not for commercial gain?
I just feel having witnessed folk without your skill (and luck) recommending to a novice to just go out and get one willy-nilly is remiss (to me) and especially as you are so highly thought of.
I'm not saying any of it as an attack and we all have our opinions and rights to air them, I was just concerned for the prospective buyer.
Look forward to more posts from us all, I always enjoy reading yours.
ATB,
Colin.