I think its just as likely there wasn't representation/consultation with an active bowhunting organisation when the legislation was drawn up than any other reason.
most legislations is drawn up by the uninitiated after all...
Over most of Northern Europe it's illegal.
There's a map, showing where it is legal to bowhunt, that can be found here :-
http://www.europeanbowhunting.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=16&Itemid=30
Do bear in mind that site's obvious bias though.
cheers,
Toddy
Over most of Northern Europe it's illegal.
There's a map, showing where it is legal to bowhunt, that can be found here :-
http://www.europeanbowhunting.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=16&Itemid=30
Do bear in mind that site's obvious bias though.
cheers,
Toddy
Great point of reference thanks.
Check out the requirements for a license, i would not have a hope in hell of passing. Not even on a very good day.
Presently all hunters must take Danish Bowhunter exam in Denmark as well as pass a proficiency test. Five out of six hunting arrows have to hit within the vital area of respectively Roedeer, fox, hare, goose, pheasant and duck. Distance varying from 5 to 25 meters. The bow must fulfil the requirements for hunting.
Nor would I with a traditional bow. I suspect (I haven't read that in depth yet) that the exam and hunting is done with a modern bow though (meaning a compound with bowsights)
Your point is valid. On both sides of the Atlantic and on ALL legislation. Not just hunting legislation.
However it does beg the question; were there any active bowhunting organizations when the legislation was drafted? If not, why not? If the answer is No, there weren't any organizations and the reason is because there just weren't enough bowhunters, then the banning of bowhunting might be a moot point anyway. And this coming from an avid hunter who loves to dabble into bowhunting.
I just dont have the time to practice and I bet its a hell of an undertaking for an archer to get to those constant standards.
Even more impressive when its a self bow with nothing to aid him besides skill and experience. I guess the whole tech bow thing would be a definite leg up I bet its still hard work.
The site quotes a very low wounding rate comparable to other methods of hunting. Only the sites word for it mind but interesting read.
Not realy sure, I'm not a hunter I've no idea. I do know the legislation was passed before the internet so rallying the troops wouldn't have been that easy. Lets be honest most of these (our) activities are considered alternative to your average voter, but make great media headlines when controlled.
......well the option is that the urbanites come visiting your country peace while loaded for bear to take out rabbits. Not recommended really.
Personally I don't feel the divide; I step out the back door and just keep walking and I'm in countryside fairly quickly. That's true for much of urban Scotland though, we're never far from water or countryside.
cheers,
M