Ah Twatter, I find it funny that mediums that give people a voice are used the most by people who have the least to say.
Ah Twatter, I find it funny that mediums that give people a voice are used the most by people who have the least to say.
And say it with such conviction.......
"...make fun of the stupidity of Americans (not that was the intention perhaps)..."
"...This is why so many Americans believe in silly things like God. No education or base intelligence to learn and so naive..."
Sorry to stir the pot and go OT here, but I believe this is what he was referring to.
About 70% of Canadians say they Believe in God
About 90% of Americans
And only about 38% in the UK.
Personally I think unbelief should be a private matter, along with belief.
I don't care what you believe in, as long as you buy your round.
Sorry to stir the pot and go OT here, but I believe this is what he was referring to.
About 70% of Canadians say they Believe in God
About 90% of Americans
And only about 38% in the UK.
But I digress.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_atheism#North_America
A belief in God, a God or Gods is not indicative of low intelligence or naiveness. Posting comments like the one in the OP may be.
I disagree. Maybe not low intelligence but its certainly naiveness or ignorance. Especially those who had it taught/drummed into them as "truth" or "fact" as a child (which I seriously consider a forum of child abuse).
I can't say I go along with that as it is much harder for non believers to be visible then. Unless you close down all the churches and religious radio and TV channels of course then you could have a point. If only the religious are visible then peer pressure will ensure that many will tag along with the idea no matter how irrational or lacking in evidence the local religion is.
"...but its certainly naiveness or ignorance..."
Perhaps I made my point poorly; all I meant was that I tend to keep to myself the fact that I am a Rationalist, unless there is a specific reason to reveal it. I find certain 'look-at-me' unbelievers (Dawkins the obvious archetype) as rude, pushy, smug and pious as any ranting, foot-in-the-door evangelist.
"...yet in many parts of the world to this day he would be killed for saying what he does..."
"...take religion away and we as a species are never slow to devise some other justification for killing one another..."
Ignorant and naive in the way that Kant was ignorant and naive? or Voltaire, Hume, Bólya, Leibniz, Bacon, Heisenberg, Hesse or Spinoza were?
The list of people who were/are really very very bright and anything but naive and yet expressed a faith of one sort or another is endless as is the list of those who were/are equally intelligent and worldly and were/are confirmed atheists.
Sweeping comments condemning all people of faith as being ignorent and naive however, now that is dumb.
But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.”
― Steven Weinberg
It's not really fair to name people from history as examples. They did not have the modern discoveries of science or even freedom to speak that we do these days. There are more top scientists named Steve than their are top Scientists who do follow organised religions these days......