A.I Created images and video
- Thread starter TeeDee
- Start date
-
Come along to the amazing Summer Moot (21st July - 2nd August), a festival of bushcrafting and camping in a beautiful woodland PLEASE CLICK HERE for more information.
You’re not on your own at all, it WILL be misused of that i am 100 percent sure. And gravely so too.
Last edited:
In my case AI= aging infirmity.< Blames A.I. >
Zero culpability.
But it does raise the question, if somebody relies upon A.I. where does the culpability lie?
- initially you'd think with that person, but if they did not know it was AI, or the AI was sold to them ?, Say for testing something, would the originator accept any liability? - I bet not, and they'll use the USA/EV autonomous driving defence of throwing bucks at it to make it go away.
But, we rely on the written or spoken word without accepting culpability; what's the difference? A great deal of what is published in the press many people just believe and re-quote - even worse on social media. At least if we ask AI a question it is likely to have scoured a great number of sources of information to come up with a more balanced answer (but still capable of being wrong admittedly).
This whole thing isn't new; it's just moving faster and is more pervasive than ever before. Traditional photographers bemoaned the arrival of digital with the enhancement tools software provided that made producing 'acceptable' photos easier; authors hated that people could rattle off new books every month by just using WP to generate versions of stories; artists hate that you can reproduce prints with such ease that true art has very little public value; and coders are now worried that anyone can generate working software; the list goes on.
This whole thing isn't new; it's just moving faster and is more pervasive than ever before. Traditional photographers bemoaned the arrival of digital with the enhancement tools software provided that made producing 'acceptable' photos easier; authors hated that people could rattle off new books every month by just using WP to generate versions of stories; artists hate that you can reproduce prints with such ease that true art has very little public value; and coders are now worried that anyone can generate working software; the list goes on.
Interestingly, I just asked ChatGPT a hypothetical question about how an artist could stay ahead of the AI game - the answer isn't surprising but is, at least, constructive
As long as that IS broad spectrum variety of sources - probably not a problem.
If they , whoever is constructing the AI back room stuff limits or deselects from certain sources I think that's a potential issue.
Think how most spellchecker progs default to an American English bias.
My son is a computer programmer of many years standing.
He is expected to be able to explain any code that he submits, something that he couldn’t do if he called on AI to work through a problem for him.
Also (I’m not sure what I’m saying here) AI uses/creates data packages and when interrogated for a package name it tends to make one up.
Malware creators are adding their code to these publicly available packages which are being picked up by other AI projects.
He is expected to be able to explain any code that he submits, something that he couldn’t do if he called on AI to work through a problem for him.
Also (I’m not sure what I’m saying here) AI uses/creates data packages and when interrogated for a package name it tends to make one up.
Malware creators are adding their code to these publicly available packages which are being picked up by other AI projects.
Probably worth investing in a Desk if he is going to make a full time thing out of it.
A.I., an "intelligence" constructed and fed by a form of life not remotely capable of controlling, let alone using properly, any form of power given to them.
What could possibly go wrong?
Of course "we" will only use it for good and proper purposes.... just as "we" did with pc's and mobile phones.
It does nothing for "us" in the sense that it makes "us" more intelligent, more creative, more free or even more prosperous.
Those that claim otherwise have not learned anything, I dare say.
What could possibly go wrong?
Of course "we" will only use it for good and proper purposes.... just as "we" did with pc's and mobile phones.
It does nothing for "us" in the sense that it makes "us" more intelligent, more creative, more free or even more prosperous.
Those that claim otherwise have not learned anything, I dare say.
Similar threads
