Nice creativity Elines
........I like that.
Thanks for that
(We won't mention that the thread is in the Photography forum, shall we?
).
Yes good point but .........
we could have a very esoteric discussion on where to draw the 'line' between unedited photography/photographs with 'reasonable' tweaking/photographs with heavy editing/computer created stuff.
For example, do we just say it's ok if it is equivalent to what used to be done in a dark room?
And what about photographing something straight off the telly (ignoring copyright issues - I'm talking hear about artistic worth)?
I guess it's another one of those areas where everyone will have different but valid views.
For what it's worth, the conclusion I've come to is that I am trying to create something that I like, and sometimes it is an unedited photograph, and sometimes it is tweaked and sometimes it is all done on gimp. So far I have only taken pictures of television screen images just to see if it was technically possible - and it is.
Personally, I'd need persuading that an otherwise good image of something on a television programme was of any real merit/ethically sound.
Mind you - I'd be interested in any other views, especially from people who have been doing photography fairly seriously for ages - I have only been into it with any intent for about five months, although I have been dabbling for years.
PS not sure how creative I was in making the the ice picture - I wasn't sure what it would look like till I pressed the final button